|
|
DRT Solutions Weekly Mail – 262nd Issue dated 17th May ‘13 All Weekly mails right from 1st Issue to latest, click links below:- Weekly Mails - 1-10 11-20 21-30 31-40 41-50 51-60 61-70 71-80 81-90 91-100 101-110 111-120 121-130 131-140 141-150 151-160 161-170 171-180 181-190 191-200 201-210 211-220 221-230 231-240 241-250251-Latest (1) Important & Useful Judgment of the Supreme Court – Court, Tribunal, DRT, Counter-claim & Appeal Nahar Industrial Enterprises vs Honkong & Shanghai Banking Corp. decided on 29.07.09 by Supreme Court of India, Judges – S.B. Sinha & Ashok Kumar Ganguly, Civil Appeal No : 4796 of 2009 DRT Solutions Citation – DRTS-013-Nahar vs HSBC-2009 http://www.drtsolutions.com/Nahar-HSBC-Counter-claim-Appeal.htm We have now numbered the Judgments published on this web site as DRTS-00.) Accordingly all the judgments published so far have been numbered. The judgment on this page is numbered as DRTS-013. Comments by DRT Solutions An Important Supreme Court Judgment about Tribunal, Court, DRT, Transfer from Court to Tribunal, Counter-claim and Appeal The full text of the judgment is given http://www.drtsolutions.com/Nahar-HSBC-Counter-claim-Appeal.htm with important portions marked in Red on pages 29, 35, 36, 38, 43, 44, 45, 49 to 52, 54, and 55. If the borrower litigants find that the adjudication of their counter-claim is not being done properly, based on this judgment, they should request DRT to transfer the said counter-claim to civil court in the interest of justice, equity and good conscience. They will not only get complete justice but their right to appeal will be safe guarded without any deposit. Since in all the cases, the amount of counter-claim is much more than the claim of the bank, there is ‘No Debt Due’ and hence until and unless the counter-claim is decided, no recovery action can be initiated against any decision of the DRT. The following are the important aspects:- (1) The ‘Tiwari Committee’ constituted by the RBI in 1981 first proposed establishment of Tribunals for expeditious recovery of bank overdues. The said committee recommended that these tribunals should be manned by persons (i.e. the Advocates and the Judges) having knowledge and experience in banking, industry and finance. Till date (even after 20 years of establishment of DRTs) the said recommendation has not been implemented. On one hand, huge court fee and other charges are being collected by the DRTs, no money is being spent on the training of the Judges and the Advocates on the essential knowledge of banking, industry and finance. This is clearly affecting award of justice particularly to the borrowers and guarantors. (2) The Supreme Court of India, 15 years back laid down the law that the Tribunals be transferred from control of the Administrative Ministry (i.e. Ministry of Finance in case of the DRTs) to Ministry of Law. Till date even after the SC verdict, the DRTs are not being transferred from the control of Ministry of Finance to Ministry of Law. The Ministry of Finance continues to post bank officials as DRT Judges and Recovery Officers. The Ministry of Finance continues to hold regular meetings with the DRT Judges asking them to expedite bank recoveries. All these are open violations of Principles of Natural Justice which are governing the DRT Act and the Securitisation Act. Under such facts and circumstances, the borrowers and guarantors can not expect justice. (3) The DRT Act was enacted in 1993. The provision of counter-claim in this Act was incorporated in 2000 and is exactly the same as in CPC 1908. In CPC itself such provision was made in 1976. The salient features of the counter-claim are as under:- (a) The counter-claim is the suit filed by the borrower. Whereas the banks are bound to file their claim for adjudication in DRTs, the borrowers are not bound to do so. The bar of civil court vide section 18 of the DRT Act applies to the banks only. (b) Further as per Section 19(11) of the DRT Act, “Where a defendant sets up a counter-claim and the applicant contends that the claim thereby raised ought not be disposed of but by way of counter-claim but in an independent action, the applicant may, at any time before issues are settled in relation to the counter-claim, apply to the Tribunal for an order that such counter-claim may be excluded, and the Tribunal may, on the hearing of such application, make such order as it thinks fit.” (c) In view of above, either the DRT has to adjudicate the counter-claim following the established procedure laid down in the CPC or transfer the case to the civil court. (d) Since the amount of counter-claim is much more than the claim of the bank, there can not be any recovery action as there is ‘No Debt Due’ till the counter-claim is fully adjudicated upon either by the DRT or by the civil court. (4) While all out emphasis has been laid on expeditious adjudication and enforcement of securities to free blocked public funds, an important aspect has not been paid attention. If all these matters are so important, the banks and the financial institutions have to be always careful and ever vigilant to avoid such actions which will delay the matters in court of law. The RBI has emphasized all these aspects since 1976 but the bank bureaucracy has not been serious in respect of e.g. signing of blank documents, execution of proper documents, eliminating questionable one side documents, providing copy of complete set of documents executed, timely sanction of needed funds, timely revival, restructure and rehabilitation, avoiding questionable delays, strict observance of RBI Guidelines and Govt policies, strict observance of duty of care, strict observance of Supreme Court leading judgments like Kripack, Maneka Gandhi, Mardia etc., proper determination of NPA as per RBI Guidelines, proper process for initiation of declaration of willful defaulters, proper conduct and actions of the Authorised Officers, strict legal audit by independent auditor before issue of notice u/s 13(2), 13(4), application u/s 14 and any appeal, transfer of DRTs from Ministry of Finance to Ministry of Law etc. If all these are strictly enforced, the consequent cases filed before DRT will be expeditiously decided. Further the burden of unnecessary cases on DRTs and Civil Courts will come down heavily. Under such circumstances only there will be expeditious recovery. Otherwise the present system of mindless litigation and unsatisfactory recovery will continue. (5) The bureaucracy in banks and financial institutions instead of correcting themselves and devising remedial internal measures are more inclined to secure stronger legal powers, having controls on DRTs through Ministry of Finance by appointing bank officers as Judges and Recovery Officers in DRTs and blaming others. It is like if you point out one finger to others, you forget that three fingers are pointing towards you. (6) Since the banks and financial institutions are less likely to correct themselves, the legal compulsions like damages and counter-claims will alone force them to do so. (7) The full text of this useful judgment is given http://www.drtsolutions.com/Nahar-HSBC-Counter-claim-Appeal.htm with important portions marked in Red on page 29, 35, 36, 38, 43, 44, 45, 49 to 52, 54, and 55. (2) Landmark Judgment on the Role of DRT In a news item dated 04.08.09, the judgment dealt by us in Sl No 1 above has been termed as Landmark Judgment on the role of DRT. The said news item is reproduced below:- http://indiacorplaw.blogspot.in/2009/08/landmark-judgment-on-role-of-debt.html The role of the Debt Recovery Tribunal has been the subject of a great deal of controversy. Some aspects of this issue have been discussed on this blog. The main question has been whether an independent suit filed by a borrower against a bank in a civil court could be transferred to the DRT as a “counterclaim” against his wishes. The law on the point was uncertain, with several conflicting judgments. Last week, the Supreme Court put the controversy to rest with a comprehensive and well-reasoned judgment. A copy of the decision, Nahar Industrial Enterprises Ltd. v. HSBC, is available here. The case concerned several appeals that had been filed against decisions of various High Courts on this question. Some had held that an independent suit was not barred, while others had held that it was, and transferred it to the appropriate DRT. To briefly recapitulate the context, s. 17 of the RDB Act provides that the DRT shall have jurisdiction to “entertain and decide applications from banks and financial institutions for recovery of debts due to such banks and financial institutions”. S. 18 ousts the jurisdiction of all courts except on writ jurisdiction to hear matters that form the subject of s. 17. Originally, the RDB Act did not contain any provision that allowed the borrower to raise a counter claim or set off. S. 19 of the Act was amended, and the law as it stands today allows a borrower to raise those issues as well. Consequently, some courts began holding that an independent suit may constitute a “counterclaim” for the purposes of s. 19 and is consequently liable to be transferred. The two main, and conflicting decisions on the point prior to Nahar were Indian Bank v. ABS Marine Products, (2006) 5 SCC 72 and SBI v. Ranjan Chemicals Ltd., (2007) 1 SCC 97. ABS Marine had held that an independent suit cannot be transferred without the consent of the borrower even if it inextricably connected with the bank’s suit and is in the nature of a counter claim. Ranjan Chemicals had held that the consent of the parties is not a limitation on the power of the court to order a transfer. In Nahar, the Supreme Court held that Ranjan Chemicals could not have departed from the law laid down in ABS Marine, as it was a decision of a coordinate Bench. The Court also seems to have accepted the argument that s. 31 of the DRT Act is exhaustive of the powers of transfer under the Act. Substantively, the Court agreed with the reasoning that a DRT is incapable of adjudicating complex issues of law and fact. It noted that a Tribunal that has the “trappings” of a court is not necessarily a court, and approved decisions that had held that the DRT is not a court. Moreover, the DRT cannot issue a decree, but only a recovery certificate. Although a DRT is empowered to take evidence in a detailed manner, the Court observed that its function is intended to make this the exception and not the rule. Thus, the position is that the DRT is not a civil court for the purposes of ss. 23, 24 and 25 of the CPC. Nor is it subordinate to the High Court. The following observations are apposite: “Concededly in the proceeding before the Debt Recovery Tribunal detailed examination; cross-examinations, provisions of the Evidence Act as also application of other provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure like interrogatories, discoveries of documents and admission need not be gone into. Taking recourse to such proceedings would be an exception. Entire focus of the proceedings before the Debt Recovery Tribunal centers round the legally recoverable dues of the bank… Under the Act, as it originally stood, did not even have any power to entertain a claim of set off or counter-claim. No independent proceedings can be initiated before it by a debtor. A debtor under the common law of contract as also in terms of the loan agreement may have an independent right. No forum has been created for endorsement of that right. Jurisdiction of a civil court as noticed hereinbefore is barred only in respect of the matters which strictly come within the purview of Section 17 thereof and not beyond the same. The Civil Court, therefore, will continue to have jurisdiction” [emphasis supplied]. The Court evolved two other important propositions. The first is the well-settled principle that a bar on the jurisdiction of the civil court is not to be readily inferred. The second, and more important, was the Court’s finding that since the right to appeal is a vested, statutory right by virtue of s. 96 of the CPC, the line of reasoning employed in Ranjan Chemicals would not only deprive the borrower of his right to sue, but also of his right to appeal.
In sum, the Court has not only reached the correct conclusion, but also
finally clarified the law on DRTs with a well-reasoned and authoritative
judgment. Worries remain, however, that the judgment may be used by
borrowers as a tool to stall the efficacy of DRTs. (3) Latest Cancer Information from John Hopkins Dr V.P. Bansal, M.B.B.S (Gold Medalist), M.D.(Allopathy),D.H.M.S.(Homoeopathy) from Indore Mobile: 91-9926020111 has sent the following useful information. Interestingly Mr Chauhan, the promoter of ‘New Diet System’ has already done pioneering work past more than 10 years and proposed that we should take only the raw natural products like fruits and vegetables when we are hungry. He termed milk as white poison. He came out with a remarkable suggestion of daily 6 hours fasting as soon as we wake up in the morning.
LATEST CANCER INFORMATION ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Our Weekly Mails and DVDs are DRT Legal Guide and gold mine of practical information for the borrowers and guarantors - The mail recipient particularly Borrowers and Guarantors will be immensely benefited by our weekly mails and DVDs, all previous issues of weekly mails from 1st one till the last one may be viewed by clicking the links given at the top. Separate web pages have been created to contain these mails in batches of 10 so that pages open up fast. These mails are gold mine of information on current topics giving lot of practical suggestions and comments. Any new recipient to these mails must go through all the weekly mails right from the issue no 1 to the latest. If possible please spread the reference of our web site and the weekly mail among the persons, borrowers and guarantors who are the bank victims. If anyone desires to get these mails regularly, he may write to us for inclusion of his e-mail ID in the regular mailing list. The weekly mail is issued on every Friday. The particular issue of the weekly mail is first published on the web site and then mailed to borrowers, guarantors and their advocates in the country. This service is free in the best interest of society in general and litigant borrowers and guarantors in particular. We are getting huge no of mails appreciating our weekly mails. We welcome suggestions.
DRT Solutions Weekly Mail – 261st Issue dated 10th May ‘13 All Weekly mails right from 1st Issue to latest, click links below:-
Weekly Mails - 1-10 11-20 21-30 31-40 4
(1) Important & Useful Judgment of the Supreme Court – DRTs even can go beyond CPC
ICICI Ltd vs Grapco Industries Ltd decided on 14.05.99 by Supreme Court of India, Judges – D. P. Wadhwa & S. Sagir Ahmed, Case No : 3167 of 1999 Citations - 1999 (3) Scale 674 : 1999 (4) SCC 710 : 1999 (2) UJ(SC) 1010 : 1999 AIR(SCW) 1664 : 1999 AIR(SC) 1975 : 1999 (5) Supreme 547 : 1999 (3) JT 619 DRT Solutions Citation – DRTS-012-ICICI vs Grapco-1999
(We have now numbered the Judgments published on this web site as DRTS-00.) Accordingly all the judgments published so far have been numbered. The judgment on this page is numbered as DRTS-012. Comments by DRT Solutions An Important Supreme Court Judgment laying down that DRTs can even go beyond CPC
(a) The
full text of the judgment is given below with important portions marked
in Red vide linkhttp://www.drtsolutions.com/ (b) But as per this Supreme Court judgment, the DRTs can even go beyond CPC. Hence whenever our clients pointed out that the POs in DRTs were not permitting application of CPC, we cited this particular judgment to them. Since such queries have increased we have thought appropriate to publish the full text of the judgment as under with important portions marked in Red, which are self explanatory. The said Red portions from Para Nos are reproduced below. (c) It is relevant to point out that the CPC is nothing but codification of the principles of natural justice. Hence in the interest of justice and depending on the facts and circumstances, the DRTs will have to follow not only the CPC but as per the law laid down in this Supreme Court judgment, the DRTs can even travel beyond CPC.
Extract from Para 7 “For all intent and purpose, an application (u/s 19 of the DRT Act) is like a plaint in civil suit and applicant would be plaintiff and respondent a defendant. The details which are required to be given in the application in substance conform to the requirements of a plaint under the Code of Civil Procedure. - - -it may perhaps be better to describe the applicant as a plaintiff, an application as a plaint and respondent as defendant.” Extract from Para 11 “When Section 22 of the Act says that the tribunal shall not be bound by the procedure laid by the Code of Civil Procedure, it does not mean that it will not have jurisdiction to exercise powers of a court as contained in the Code of Civil procedure. Rather, the tribunal can travel beyond the Code of Civil Procedure and the only fetter that is put on its powers is to observe the principles of natural justice.”
(2) Court Judgments – Important, Useful & Favourable to Borrowers & Guarantors We have so far published 12 important, useful and favourable judgments on our web site in full text with comments as well as important portions marked in Red. Many of our clients and their advocates have appreciated these valuable judgments. Encouraged by such feedback, we are adding one such judgment every week. Instant availability on our web site has proved a great utility and valuable instant resource for the practicing DRT advocate. The titles of the relevant web pages and URLs have been technically chosen in such a manner so that the search engines will rank the same for most easy search. Our citation i.e. DRTS-000-Names of Parties-Year of Decision also will make the referencing an easy and convenient task. We invite comments and suggestions for further improvements, if any.
(3) ‘DRT Solutions Weekly Mail’ will complete 5 Years on 16.05.13
We published the following news item in our last weekly mail. Accordingly we have received lot of good wishes, appreciations and felicitations for successful completion of past 5 years of weekly mails. We profusely thank such readers.
“We are glad to point out that on 16.05.13, our this ‘DRT Solutions Weekly Mail’ will complete 5 Years of uninterrupted and useful service to our readers and visitors of our web site. All the weekly mails right from issue no 1 to the latest are available on our web site free of costs. People have become addicted to our weekly mail. If there is any delay on any Friday, we get lot of phone calls and e-mails. We get lot of feedback and comments every week. Many persons come to us with complete print of all our mails with index. Many go on revising the previous weekly mails and they cite the same in their correspondence. People have liked the format with content on Lifestyle and Health Topics. Now we embark our journey to next five years. The readers are requested to send their felicitations, good wishes, comments on the auspicious occasion of completing five years and looking ahead for next five years.”
(4) “The Seven Spiritual Laws of Success” by Deepak Chopra
Mr Firoz Poonawalla has sent the following valuable information:-
‘The universal mind choreographs everything that is happening in billions of galaxies with elegant precision and unfaltering intelligence.’ The Law of Pure Potentiality The source of all creation is pure potentiality seeking expression from being unmanifest to manifest. How do we bring this law into effect in our life ? By taking time to be silent, to just Be. By sitting alone in silent meditation for half an hour in the morning and in the evening. By taking time each day to commune with nature, silently. witness the intelligence within each living thing and by enjoying the life throb of nature’s unbounded creativity By being non-judgmental The Law of Giving The universe operates through dynamic exchange… giving and receiving are different aspects of the flow of energy in the universe. Our willingness to give that which we seek keeps the abundance of the universe circulating in our lives. How do bring this law into effect in our life ? By giving a gift to whoever we meet. It may be a flower a compliment or a prayer…. This will begin the process of circulating joy, wealth and affluence in our life and in the life of others By gratefully accept all the gifts that life has to offer . The sunlight, the song of birds, the monsoon rain….Also by receiving gifts that others may offer, be it material gifts a compliment or a prayer. By making a commitment to keep wealth circulating by giving and receiving life’s most precious gifts, of caring, affection, appreciation and love and by silently wishing happiness joy and laughter each time we meet someone The Law of Karma Every action generates a force of energy that returns to us in like kind. Our thoughts, our words and deeds are the thread of the net which we throw around ourselves How do we bring this law into effect in our life ? By being a witness to the choices we make each moment and bringing them to our conscious awareness. By asking ourselves ‘What are the consequences of this choice, will this choice bring fulfillment and happiness to me and to those who are affected by it ?’ By seeking guidance and being guided by its message of comfort or discomfort. By considering the consequences of our actions or words and making corrections if need be. The Law of Least Effort Nature’s intelligence functions with effortless ease, with carefreeness, harmony and love. When we harness the forces of harmony, joy and love we create success and good fortune with effortless ease. How do we bring this law into effect in our life ? By accepting totally and completely people, situations, events and circumstances as they occur and to accept each moment as it is and not as we’d wish it to be. . By taking responsibility for those of our situations that we see as problems and not blaming others or ourselves. Every problem is an opportunity in disguise and allows us to take the opportunity to transform it into a greater benefit By relinquish the need to defend our point of view or to convince or persuade others to accept it. And yet to be open and consider other points of view. The Law of Intention and Desire Inherent in every intention and desire is the mechanism for its fulfillment. When we introduce an intention in the fertile ground of pure potentiality, we put this infinite organizing power to work for us. How do we bring this law into effect in our life ? By making a list of our desires and by referring to this list before we begin our meditation, also by referring to it before going to sleep and on waking up. By trusting and surrendering ourselves to creation when things don’t seem to go our way and to know that there is a reason for this. And that the cosmic plan has designs for us greater than those we have conceived for ourselves By keeping to the present moment with awareness and not allowing obstacles to dissipate the quality of our intention and desires from being manifested. The Law of Detachment In detachment lies the wisdom of uncertainty and freedom from our past conditioning. This allows us to step into the unknown field of possibilities and to surrender ourselves to the creative mind of the universe. How do we bring this law of into effect in our life ? By committing to detachment we allow ourselves and others to be as they are, and not force solutions on problems by creating new problems. By willingly accepting uncertainty, solutions spontaneously emerge to our problems of confusion and disorder. By being open to all possibilities, we experience the joy, adventure and the mystery of life. The Law of Purpose of Life Every one has a purpose in life….it may be a special gift… a special talent…..when we blend this gift or talent with others and for others, we experience exultation of our spirit. This is our ultimate goal and the reason for our being in a physical form. How do we bring this law into effect in our life? By nurturing the deep stillness within ourselves that will awaken our mind to the consciousness of eternal timelessness midst of time-bound experiences. By expressing our talents and using them for humanity, we create abundance in our life and in the life of others. By asking ourselves daily ‘How can I serve ? ‘ and ‘How can I help?’ The answer to these questions will allow us to serve and help our fellow human beings with love. These pages are from The Seven Spiritual Laws of Success By Deepak Chopra. I have condensed the book of a hundred pages to eight, in the hope that this will motivate the reader [by this I also mean my family] to read the original. Enjoy.
DRT Solutions Weekly Mail – 260th Issue dated 3rd May ‘13 All Weekly mails right from 1st Issue to latest, click links on top of this page (1) Important & Useful Judgment of the Supreme Court – Counter-claim can be filed even after filing of WS Full text of this important judgment with comments and important portion given in red may be seen vide link http://www.drtsolutions.com/Mahendra-MP.htm Details are as under:-
DRT Solutions Weekly Mail – 259th Issue dated 26th April ‘13 All Weekly mails right from 1st Issue to latest, click links on top of this page
1) Important & Useful Judgment of the Supreme Court – Discovery, Production and Inspection of Documents
H.L. Sethi vs R.P. Kapur decided on 19.07.72 by Supreme Court of India, Judges – K.K. Mathew & P. Jaganmohan Reddy, Case No : 665(n) of 19721
Citations - 1972 (2) SCC 427 : 1973 (1) SCR 697 : 1972 AIR(SC) 2379 : 1972 Legal Eagle 320
DRT Solutions Citation – DRTS-010-Sethi vs Kapur-SC-1972
(We have now numbered the Judgments published on this web site as DRTS-00.) Accordingly all the judgments published so far have been numbered. The judgment on this page is numbered as DRTS-010.
Comments by DRT Solutions An Important Supreme Court Judgment relating to Discovery, Production and Inspection of the Documents
(a) The
full text of the judgment is given on our web site vide link http://www.drtsolutions.com/ (b) This is one of the most important SC Judgments relating to the documents. (c) All the bank litigations are based on documents. Hence discovery of all the material documents is most essential pre-requisite of the bank litigations. In this connection the following extract from this judgment are quite relevant. (d) Extract from Para 5:- If a party wants inspection of documents in the possession of the opposite party, he cannot inspect them unless the other party produces them. The party wanting inspection must, therefore, call upon the opposite party to produce the document.
(e) Another extract from Para 5:- When the Court makes an order for discovery under the rule, the opposite party is bound to make an affidavit of documents and if he fails to do so, he will be subject to the penalties specified in Rule 21 of Order 11. An affidavit of documents shall set forth all the documents which are, or have been in his possession or power relating to the matter in question in the proceedings. And as to the documents which are not, but have been in his possession or power, he must state what has become of them and in whose possession they are, in order that the opposite party may be enabled to get production from the persons who have possession of them (see Form No. 5 in Appendix C of the Civil Procedure Code). After he has disclosed the documents by the affidavit, he may be required to produce for inspection such of the documents as he is in possession of and as are relevant. (f) Extract from Para 5:- The documents sought to be discovered need not be admissible in evidence in the enquiry or proceedings. It is sufficient if the documents would be relevant for the purpose of throwing light on the matter in controversy. Every document which will throw any light on the case is a document relating to a matter in dispute in the proceedings, though it might not be admissible in evidence. In other words, a document might be inadmissible in evidence yet it may contain information which may either directly or indirectly enable the party seeking discovery either to advance his case or damage the adversary's case or which may lead to a trial of enquiry which may have either of these two consequences (g) If the advocate of the borrower has proper knowledge and adequate experience of trial and is well versed with material facts relating to the banking, industry and finance and perfect pleadings of the counter-claim has been made, no bank can win its recovery case as there are lot of wrong doings committed by the banks. Under such facts and circumstances, this particular judgment will be immensely useful.
(2) Strategy & Planning Borrowers’ Litigation in DRTs
Our observations and views are as under:- (a) Right from inception since the entrepreneurs were not having adequate finance and therefore they approached the banks for financial assistance. (b) The banks are mammoth organizations having hundreds of branches and thousands of employees. Most of the big banks are in existence for more than 50 years and hence they have huge financial resources and long experience. They have well established law departments headed by General Manager(Law) The financial liquidity is also high due to CRR prescribed by the RBI. (c) Compared with the banks, the borrowers are too small with virtually no knowledge of banking and law. Their financial resources are also too small compared with the banks. Further the said financial resources are already tied up and deployed with very small liquidity. (d) On account of many external factors which may be beyond control, the business becomes sick and the liquidity becomes negative. Under such financial problems, the banks instead of helping, apply pressure for recovery. The borrower may not have even funds for survival leave alone for legal fight. (e) The advocates of the borrowers must keep in mind above facts and circumstances while making strategy and planning the litigation in DRTs. (f) The case must be reviewed at least 7 days in advance of the date. One should plan if there is any adverse happening on the ensuing date. (g) Whatever happens on the date, plan must be prepared on the said date itself. (h) Since most of the environment is against the borrower, greater effort and hard work is required. (i) The pleadings should be perfect. (j) In most of the cases, the replies by the banks are only simple denials. Hence right from the beginning preparations should be made for such denials. (k) Despite orders of the Supreme Court more than past 15 years, the bank lobby is not allowing transfer of the DRTs from Ministry of Finance to Ministry of Law. Hence most of the POs and Recovery Officers are being appointed and posted out of bank officials. Further it is against Law that Ministry of Finance is holding regular meetings with the said POs to expedite recovery. All such activities by Ministry of Finance amounts to wrong doings being against the principles of natural justice. (l) Under the above biased environment, the advocates of the borrowers have to be more vigilant and alert. As soon as any order is issued, it should be thoroughly examined. If there is any scope for Review, review must be planned. One has to plan the Appeal also so that just after Review, Appeal is filed within the limitations. We have dealt with this aspect in several weekly mails e.g. 1st to 8th (17.05.08 to 04.07.08), 21st to 30th, 31st to 40thand thereafter. (m) As per law, Review must be filed first and then Appeal should be filed. The law on the subject was settled as early as 1909 vide exhaustive details given in AIR 1948 Allahabad 353. Both proceedings may go on simultaneously. As soon as there is any final order, the other may be discontinued. Further steps be planned after the said final order. (n) The counter-claim is the suit filed by the borrower. It should be handled by knowledgeable and experienced Trial Lawyer who has personally handled several trial relating to the bank litigations. (o) We observed that the DRT Advocates are quite busy and mostly are not having experience and knowledge of trial, we had no option but to empower the borrower litigants so that he emphasizes all important aspects to his advocate. (p) With the above approach several of our clients have achieved success in DRTs and the wrong doer lenders have been forced either to settle even at 5% to 20% of the debt due or they are fighting a losing battle in the appellate court. (q) We have found that much will depend as to how thoroughly the counter-claims are fought in DRTs. That will depend on knowledgeable and experience trial lawyers. There is no other option or short cut.
(3) Co-Op Banks can’t Act under Securitization Law’
The following news item is self explanatory:- Co-op banks can't act under securitization law'TNN Apr 23, 2013, 05.36AM IST
AHMEDABAD: To recover debts, co-operative banks cannot seize property or take its possession according to the provisions of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act. That was the ruling of the Gujarat high court on Monday. Advocate in this case, Masoom Shah, said that the division bench of the Gujarat HC has overruled judgments issued by various high courts of Kerala, Bombay, Madras, Karnataka, Madhya Pradesh, Punjab and Haryana. All these HCs had declared the scheme as legal, but the Gujarat HC's division bench relied on the Supreme Court's judgment in the matter of Greater Bombay Co-operative Bank versus United Yarn Pvt Ltd. The division bench also declared the Centre's notification issued on January 28, 2003, bringing cooperative societies and banks under the purview of the act as void. It held that securitization act would not be applicable to cooperative banks because it would contradict Banking Regulation Act, 1949. The petitioners, who had defaulted on repayment of loans from various cooperative banks in the state, were facing notices from banks under the securitization act, and the possibility of seizure of properties. (4) Healthy & Disease Free Life through Natural Raw Diet
Mr B.V. Chauhan, B.E.(Electrical), Retd SE (Gujrat Electricity Board)
has come out with a revolutionary approach to Healthy and Disease Free
Life through Natural Raw Diet. The details may be seen from his web sitehttp://www.newdiet4health.org/ His first Hindi Book ‘Prakritik Apakva Ahar se Nirogi Jeevan’ was gifted to me by our family doctor.
This book is available from ‘Shri Ram Kutir, Ganesh Society, Chittal Road, Amreli-365601 (Gujrat) Phone No 02792-226869. The contact details of Mr Chauhan are as under:- E-mail : balubhaic@gmail.com balu1946aml@gmail.com Phone : 02792-226869 ; 9426127255
DRT Solutions Weekly Mail – 258th Issue dated 19th April ‘13 All Weekly mails right from 1st Issue to latest, click links on top of this page
(1) Important & Useful Judgment of Kerala High Court – Bank’s Application u/s 14 to Magistrate, Appealable u/s 17 to DRT
Sami vs Bank of India decided
on 22.07.11 by Kerala High Court, Judge – S. Siri Jagan, Full text of
the judgment with our comments and important portion marked in Red may
be seen by clicking the link http://www.drtsolutions.com/ Our Comments Past several years we have been advising our clients to file caveat with the Magistrate and as soon as the bank approaches Magistrate, appeal u/s 17 be filed before DRT. This Kerala judgment has supported our line of thinking. Important portion marked in Red are self explanatory The concept and approach in this judgment can be further extended. The moment there is any threat for taking possession and or disposal of the property such as initiating sale or auction, we should approach to the DRT u/s 17. In this context one must set up counter-claim which must include loss and damages. We have found that the said loss and damages are much more than the claim of the bank resulting into ‘No Debt Due’ Hence until and unless ‘No Debt Due’ is finally decided by the adjudicatory process, no recovery action can be initiated leave alone proceeding with.
(2) “Garbage Menace” – Your Little Effort can do Wonders Mr Rajesh Jain M – 08427931111 and L - 01613966399, one of our clients from Ludhiana has sent us his following valuable article:- “GARBAGE MENACE”- YOUR LITTLE EFFORT CAN DO WONDERS
We all are facing one serious problem of Garbage. We all are contributors to this problem and blame local municipality as they are responsible to solve this problem. The garbage piles are taking shapes of mountains if you enter Delhi from Karnal side you can see those mountains, almost whole outskirts of Delhi or any metro city is being developed on such type of landfills. The future generations is going to occupy the land i.e our children. Have you ever thought how can we minimise this problem? Have you tried to take a note what is there in garbage? You will never have courage to stop near the garbage dump and like to have a closer look while passing near to it, because it stinks and is surrounded by flies, mosquitoes and harmful bacteria. But let me tell give you the idea. Industrial waste+ Institutional waste like Hospitals etc. They are controlled by regulatory bodies but the major contributor is house hold garbage, which is uncontrolled? Our house hold garbage consists of: Mainly Kitchen waste & polythene bags, plastics, metals, non metals, boxes and paper etc. The Mantra is
“NOT TO DISPOSE EVERYDAY THE NON STINKING MATERIALS” (Except decomposing matter)
WHY DISPOSE THAT PART OF GARBAGE EVERYDAY? Which is not troubling you as it is not stinking and will not decompose for years? Keep it separate!! Give to someone who is accepting and selling to those who recycling it.
This will solve problems partially, without getting any help of Govt. nominated bodies, you are right, they will not help, and we help ourselves. It will not involve extra effort or money; no money will be generated at our end.
Let municipality do the remaining job what is doing already, they will not have any objection to it.
How we can do it ? Kitchen waste, which stinks within no time and you want to get rid of it as soon as possible, Go ahead! No one stops you........... Stop! Stop! Why are you mixing it with other wastes which are not troubling you as it is not stinking and will not decompose for years? WHY DISPOSE EVERYDAY? Why not keep it separate and collect it in a big jute bag to be kept in the rear of the house. Dispose when it is full by donating it to some rag pickers who makes his living out of it, at the same time reducing his effort and avoiding his exposure to unhealthy working conditions (I see mainly young girls or boys not even 13 in this category). But it will not be wise for him or for you to collect the smaller lots; it has to be considerable quantity so that next time he will come knocking at your door asking for the collection. I am very much against child labour or this type job and I do not promote it, our country is big and there are too many unemployed, however this will be temporary arrangement since there is no such agency so far which does collect this type of recyclable materials like in developed nations where you will be charged for the service. Our main culprit in our garbage dumps is polythene bags, plastics, metals, non metals, boxes and paper which is almost two third of the whole pile, it will be easy for the municipality to handle the rest of garbage efficiently. However if you are really ENVIRONMENTALIST then kitchen waste also no need to throw just like that you can convert it to VERMICOMPOST. Which is a very good fertilizer for your lawns or flowerpots? If his message can go to each and every house by NGO’s, Schools, colleges or by social networking It will do wonders and save lot of National wealth going down the drain or in landfills and creating Garbage Menace. The writer has been producing ‘Vermicompost’ from cow dung and Apple pomace on large scale Basis and is ready to provide any help in this sector for Public Interest. My own House model to save environment is as below: ( My house can be visited to demonstrate to enthusiastic. )
SOLID WASTE: · Total kitchen waste+ Garden waste I convert into vermi-compost, I have a pit of 2’x 8’ in my backyard (really it does not stink at all) the fertilizer is used for organic vegetables + lawns. · Plastics of all types + all others, I keep in a Jute bag to be disposed every fortnight, believe me it was a real help to our domestic helpers, who were reluctant to so in the beginning, but it is easy for them now, and to the rag picker too, who in kind keeps our area free from poly bags thrown by unknown persons, as we deliver him only on this condition. WATER DISPOSAL: · Bath rooms+ kitchen+ rain water is collected in a tank which we use for kitchen garden and lawns by pumping. · I have separated toilet disposal to a septic tank and then to soak pit. ELECTRICITY SAVINGS: · I have installed solar water heater , we explore all the possibilities to make use of this free heat · We use for bathrooms No geysers. · We use preheated water in kitchen. · We have washing machine with two water inlets hot and cold, hot one is connected to solar water heater. · We have LED and CFLs · We use Fans+ Air coolers for APR –MAY-JUNE · Air conditioners with their outer units are placed in shade and in well air circulated area so that maximum efficiency is obtained as compared to the one placed in the Sun or where air circulation is minimum. GAS SAVINGS:
I have traditional fire place (Chullah) in backyard to take care of wood logs and very small paper and other non plastic materials, which can be recycled, but I am afraid that rag pickers will collect from us and throw at some other place, so to avoid that it is better to produce heat for domestic purposes like water heating etc as LPG is becoming costlier, may be it will save fraction of money , but more important is proper disposal. About ash being produced , we use again on our vegetables it has double action , it protects from pests as well as it acts as a fertilizer.
GREEN BUILDING: · I have made my house using “VASTU” which makes best utilization of Sunlight and Air, hollow walls in South and west, maximum windows and doors in North and east, thus saving on Electricity on account of Light and air-conditioning as you will require very less. · It has health benefits, thus you save on medicals also. · I have planted Appox 50 fruit bearing trees and climbers in the south which gives you fruit as well protects you from harsh effects of SUN. · I have painted my house and roof top in white, so that minimum heat is absorbed from SUN, and is reflected outwards. · I am waiting for Photo Voltaic panels to be cheaper and efficient to clad my house from SOUTH/WEST and top to generate electricity for our use.
(3) The Brick Mr Dinesh Kakkad from Jalagaon has sent the following beautiful piece:-
THE
------------------------------ Our Weekly Mails and DVDs are DRT Legal Guide and gold mine of practical information for the borrowers and guarantors - The mail recipient particularly Borrowers and Guarantors will be immensely benefited by our weekly mails and DVDs, all previous issues of weekly mails from 1st one till the last one may be viewed by clicking the links given at the top. Separate web pages have been created to contain these mails in batches of 10 so that pages open up fast. These mails are gold mine of information on current topics giving lot of practical suggestions and comments. Any new recipient to these mails must go through all the weekly mails right from the issue no 1 to the latest. If possible please spread the reference of our web site and the weekly mail among the persons, borrowers and guarantors who are the bank victims. If anyone desires to get these mails regularly, he may write to us for inclusion of his e-mail ID in the regular mailing list. The weekly mail is issued on every Friday. The particular issue of the weekly mail is first published on the web site and then mailed to borrowers, guarantors and their advocates in the country. This service is free in the best interest of society in general and litigant borrowers and guarantors in particular. We are getting huge no of mails appreciating our weekly mails. We welcome suggestions. DRT Solutions Weekly Mail – 257th Issue dated 12th April ‘13
All Weekly mails right from 1st Issue to latest, click links
below:-
Weekly Mails -
1-10 11-20 21-30 31-40 41-50 51-60 61-70 71-80 81-90 91-100 101-110 111-120
121-130
131-140
141-150
151-160
161-170
171-180
181-190
191-200
201-210
211-220
221-230
231-240
241-250
251-Latest
(1) Important & Useful Judgment of SC - Points Pressed during Arguments have to be dealt with in the Judgment/Order
Following is the extract from our web page vide link
http://www.drtsolutions.com/
Mohd. Akram Ansari vs Chief Election Officer & Others decided on 04.12.07 by Supreme Court of India, Judges – A.K. Mathur & Markandey Katju, Civil Appeal No 4981 of 2006 with Civil Appeal No 5828 of 2006 Citations - 2008 (2) SCC 95 : 2007 (12) SCR 901 2007 (14) Scale 30 : 2007 AIOL 1255 : 2007 Legal Eagle 1255 :
Comments by DRT Solutions
The full text of the judgment is given vide
link http://www.drtsolutions.com/ "there is a presumption in law that a Judge deals with all the points which have been pressed before him. It often happens that in a petition or appeal several points are taken in the memorandum of the petition or appeal, but at the time of arguments only some of these points are pressed. Naturally a Judge will deal only with the points which are pressed before him in the arguments and it will be presumed that the appellant gave up the other points, otherwise he would have dealt with them also. If a point is not mentioned in the judgment of a Court, the presumption is that that point was never pressed before the learned Judge and it was given up. However, that is a rebuttable presumption. In case the petitioner contends that he had pressed that point also (which has not been dealt with in the impugned judgment), it is open to him to file an application before the same learned Judge (or Bench) which delivered the impugned judgment, and if he satisfies the Judge (or Bench) that the other points were in fact pressed, but were not dealt with in the impugned judgment, it is open to the concerned Court to pass appropriate orders, including an order of review. However, it is not ordinarily open to the party to file an appeal and seek to argue a point which even if taken in the petition or memorandum filed before the Court below, has not been dealt with in the judgment of the Court below. The party who has this grievance must approach the same Court which passed the judgment, and urge that the other points were pressed but not dealt with."
(2) Favourable and & Useful DRT Judgments for Borrowers and Guarantor- As a result ranking of our web site in ‘Google India’ for search ‘Weekly Mail’ is top among 553,000,000 results
Following is the extract from our web page vide link
http://www.drtsolutions.com/
Consequent on our weekly issue of favourable and useful DRT judgments for borrowers and guarantors, we have received numerous response and appreciation from not only the mail recipients but from several unknown persons. As a result the ranking of our web site in the search word ‘Weekly Mail’ has gone so high that the same in ‘Google India’ is now top among 553,000,000 entries. This shows and proves tremendous popularity of our weekly mails. We shall continue publishing at least one such judgment every week. We need your feedback. The recipients have liked the format. Easy and free of cost availability of full text of such important and useful judgments with comments as well as important portion marked in Red have boosted the value of such cyber publication. For quick and instant availability, we have allotted exclusive separate page for each of the judgments. So far we have published full text of the following judgments (with comments and important portions marked in Red) which are favourable and useful to the borrowers and guarantors:- Note :- DRTS-00 stands for 'DRT Legal Solutions-00' and is the Citation for judgments on this web site. ◙ DRTS-09 Kerala High Court Judgment on 'Bank's Application to Magistrate u/s 14 is appealable to DRT u/s 17' in the matter of 'Sami vs Bank of India' decided on 22.07.11. Full text of the judgment with our comments is available vide link http://www.drtsolutions.com/Magistrate-Appeal.htm Important portions of the judgment have been marked in Red.◙ DRTS-08 Supreme Court Judgment on 'Points Pressed during Arguments have to be mentioned in the Judgment/Order' in the matter of 'Mohd. Akram Ansari vs Chief Election Officer and Others' decided on 04.12.07. Full text of the judgment with our comments is available vide link http://www.drtsolutions.com/Points-Pressed.htm Important portions of the judgment have been marked in Red.◙ DRTS-07 Allahabad High Court Judgment on 'SA u/s 17 and 18 to be decided before any Recovery Action' in the matter of 'Gulshan Rai, Jain and Others vs Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal and Others' decided on 28.09.11. Full text of the judgment with our comments is available vide http://www.drtsolutions.com/SA-Before-Recovery.htm Important portions of the judgment have been marked in Red.◙ DRTS-06 DRAT, Delhi Judgment on 'Counterclaim permissible in SA u/s 17 of Securitisation Act' in the matter of 'Vijaya Bank vs B. L. Gupta' decided on 16.03.11. Full text of the judgment with our comments is available vide http://www.drtsolutions.com/counterclaim-SA.htm Important portions of the judgment have been marked in Red.◙ DRTS-05 Supreme Court Judgment on 'Property Valuation, Sale, Auction and Disposal' in the matter of 'Ram Kishun & Others vs State of UP & Others decided on 24.05.12. Full text of the judgment with our comments is available vide http://www.drtsolutions.com/SC-Property-Disposal.htm Important portions of the judgment have been marked in Red. ◙ DRTS-04 Karnataka High Court Judgment on 'Notice u/s 13(4) is a must before initiating action u/s 14 for approaching to the Magistrate' in the matter of K.R. Krishnegowda vs Authorised Officer decided on 27.03.12. Full text of the judgment with our comments is available vide link http://www.drtsolutions.com/13(4)-14-Magistrate.htm Important portions of the judgment have been marked in Red. ◙ DRTS-03 Patna High Court Judgment on 'Dismissal of the OA' in the matter of Purnea Cold Storage vs State Bank of India decided on 27.08.12. As soon as SA is filed, the existing OA or if OA is filed, the same deserves to be dismissed. Full text of the judgment with our comments is available vide link www.drtsolutions.com/OA_Dismissal.htm Important portions of the judgment have been marked in Red. ◙ DRTS-02 Supreme Court of India on simultaneous proceedings of OA and SA in the matter of Transcore vs Union of India decided on 29.11.06 :- Full text of this judgment is available on this site vide link http://www.drtsolutions.com/sc_judgment_on_drt,_securitisation,_transcore.htm This judgment is referred to in the above Patna High Court Judgment. Past several years, we have observed that majority of the advocates and the judges are making mistake in interpreting this Transcore Judgment. Patna High Court has supported our line of thinking. ◙ DRTS-01 Bombay High Court Judgment on Condonation of Delay in the matter of Manilal Govindji Khona vs Indian Bank decided on 29.08.12 :- Full text of this judgment with our comments is available on this site vide link www.drtsolutions.com/condonation_delay.htm Important portions of the judgment have been marked in Red. We have been opining past several years that the matter of condonation of delay has to be permitted in the DRTs despite several judgments of the High Courts. Now our contentions have been supported by this Bombay High court judgment.
(3) Books on Naturopathy, Diet, Cure of Diseases etc.
Recently we have come across wonderful books written by Dr Nagendra Kumar Neeraj on the topics of Naturopathy, Diet, Cure for various diseases etc. Dr Neeraj is at present Chief Medical Incharge, Naturopathy Centre, Patanjali Yog Peeth, Haridwar. In fact I have recorded several Video Clips of Dr Neeraj when he spoke on Naturopathy in presence of Swami Ramdevji as well as Pradumn Maharajji (Guru of Swami Ramdevji) Dr Neeraj is also Vice President of International Naturopathy Organisation, ex-CMO, Health Director, Advisor of several organizations; ex-Zonal Secretary, (1984-2004 i.e. 20 years) Akhil Bhartiya Praktik Chikitsa Parisad. He has written more than 25 books. He has received several international awards in the field of naturopathy. One can find numerous reference of his books on the internet.
(3) A Wonderful Poem
Mr Firoz Poonawalla has sent the following heart touching poem:-
DRT Solutions Weekly Mail – 256th Issue dated 5th April ‘13 All Weekly mails right from 1st Issue to latest, click links on top of this page
(1) SA under 17 and 18 should have been Decided before Any Recovery Action rules Allahabad High Court
Following is the extract from our web page vide link
http://www.drtsolutions.com/
Gulshan Rai, Jain and Others versus DRAT, Allahabad and Others decided on 28.09.11 by Allahabad High Court, Bench at Lucknow, D.B., Misc Bench No. 9623 of 2011, Judges – Devi Prasad Singh & Dr. Satish Chandra
(Reference – from internet vide link of Allahabad High Court –
http://elegalix. Comments by DRT Solutions
The full text of the judgment is given vide
link http://www.drtsolutions.com/ (a) In para (5) this judgment it is stated that “Thus, it appears that instead of deciding the issue with regards to question involved therein (i.e. in the SA), the original authority as well as the appellate authority has permitted the respondent-bank to proceed with the auction and sale of the property in question.” (b) This has validated our contentions past several years that the DRT should first decide the SA before initiating any action for recovery. At the most the bank may take symbolic possession. (c) As per the above judgment, the DRT and DRAT respectively in the matter of application u/s 17 and 18 are required to take following measures:- (i) to issue interim orders as soon as the case is filed before them. (ii) and then to decide the matter on merits expeditiously within the time limit prescribed in the Act. (d) Till the above is done, there should not be any action towards enforcement of recovery against the securities. (e) This has been our contentions past several years and the same have been validated by this judgment. (f) As regards expeditious action to decide the SA, the time period mentioned in the Act is 4 months. This may be possible in simple cases where proper defence has not been raised by the borrowers and guarantors and no counter-claim has been setup. (g) However in respect of the pleadings prepared by us, full trial within 4 months will not be possible. First of all our pleadings are based on all wrong doings committed by the bank on account of the violations of the RBI Guidelines which are proved by the documents. In most of the cases, the declaration of NPA itself is wrong. Further there are mistakes in the calculation of debt due. Over and above, on account of counter-claim (loss and damages in the SA)which is much more than the amount claimed by the bank, there is situation of ‘No Debt Due’ Such exhaustive pleadings will result into several material issues, adjudication of which will definitely require lot of time. (h) The adjudication will first start with inspection of original documents which are in power and possession of the bank. If all the documents are given, the bank will lose the case. Hence the banks avoid giving all the documents. This controversy will itself take lot of time even for years. (i) The DRT may adopt all methods of expeditious adjudication but no short cuts can be employed which may cause injustice. (j) This approach based on this judgment can be used as under:- (i) When one has pleaded counter-claim and situation has arisen for ‘No Debt Due’, (ii) No recovery action against the securities as per sec 13(4) of the Act can be taken until and unless the application u/s 17 and 18 are decided on merits. (iii) Hence the interim orders should not have any element of deposit. (iv) No action can be taken by the Magistrate u/s 14. (v) Since the banking transactions in respect of business and industries involve complex facts based on documents, the fair trial will take sufficient time of the DRT or DRAT particularly when full pleadings have been framed and counter-claim has been pleaded. (k) We have been emphasizing above past more than 10 years and this judgment has supported our contentions. (2) Beautiful Good Morning Mr Firoz Poonawalla has sent the following interesting piece:- BEAUTIFUL GOOD MORNING!!!!!!!!!!!!
This is without a doubt one of the nicest good luck forwards I have
received. Hope you also like the same.
DRT Solutions Weekly Mail – 255th Issue dated 29th March ‘13 All Weekly mails right from 1st Issue to latest, click links on top of this page (1) Counter-claim Permissible in Securitisation Application u/s 17, rules DRAT Delhi Following is the extract from our web page vide link http://www.drtsolutions.com/DRT-Judgments.htm Vijaya Bank versus B. L. Gupta decided on 16.03.11 by Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Delhi upholding that counter-claim can be filed in the application u/s 17 of the Securitisation Act in DRT. This is validation of our contentions past nearly 10 years. The full text of the judgment is given on our web site vide link http://www.drtsolutions.com/counterclaim-SA.htm The important portions of the judgment has been marked in Red. Comments by DRT Solutions :- Our comments are as under:- (a) Past nearly 10 years we have been telling our clients to include loss and damages (i.e. counter-claim) in their application u/s 17 of the Securitisation Act. In fact in several of the said applications drafted by us, we have done so e.g. in case of one of our clients from Bangalore in 2006. (b) We have voiced our contentions in our web site, DRT All India Conferences held at Indore in 2008 and 2011 as well as in our weekly mails. (c) In the above DRAT Delhi judgment, reference has been made to the SC Judgment of 2004 in the matter of Mardia Chemicals. (d) As a whole our contentions are based on the following legal analysis:- (i) The borrower as a citizen has fundamental rights of fair trial under the constitution of India and the said rights can not be abridged or curtailed by anybody or by any enactment including the Securitisation Act of 2002. (ii) Since Sec 34 of the said Securitisation Act has barred the civil court, the said rights of fair trial for the borrowers are to be ensured and assured by the DRTs. (iii) Since as per Mardia in 2004 and now specifically explained by the DRAT Delhi in 2011, borrower’s counter-claim has to be adjudicated upon by fair trial by the DRTs. (iv) The DRTs may adopt expeditious and summary process to judicial determination of the bank claims but for the counter-claim of the borrower, full and exhaustive trial has to be conducted and carried out as he was entitled in the civil court before the said bar due to Securitisation Act of 2002. (v) Since in most of the cases, we have found that the said loss and damages or counter-claim is much more than the claim of the bank, there is the situation of ‘No Debt Due’ and hence no recovery action on the securities can be initiated till the said ‘No Debt Due’ is judicial determined by the full and fair trial. (vi) On account of above, the DRT Act, Securitisation Act and DRTs have limited role or function as it would have been better to improve the civil courts as a whole instead of creating new forums like DRTs. (vii) We don’t want to learn from the experience of other countries. In UK, the tribunals were introduced in 1800. It took more than 150 years to find out correct solution i.e. by Sir Frank Committee in 1957. (viii) As told by eminent justice Krishna Iyer that our courts are 200 years behind the courts in developed countries.. There are 73 countries whose judicial systems are better than us. The only and better solution is to improve the courts based on the system developed in those countries which have better judicial system. (ix) Since the relevant institutions like Govt, Law Commission, Bar Council of India and Law Colleges are not doing desirable work (and they will not do for obvious reasons), the public has to come forward. While litigants in civil courts can not do much, those in DRTs can do much better as the Businessmen and Industrialists as litigants are much more competent and resourceful. Till the judiciary and judicial systems are improved, we cannot have real democracy i.e. rule for public, rule by public and rule of public as against rule by Bureaucrats & Politicians, rule of Bureaucrats & Politicians and rule for Bureaucrats & Politicians. (x) The full and fair adjudication of claim for loss and damages or counter-claim will alone bring to light the wrong doings committed by the bureaucracy in the banks and financial institutions after which only the banks and the said institutions will improve and after that only the hold of the politicians on these institutions will come down. Thus the DRT litigants have a great responsibility and role to play. (2) Writ Jurisdiction ousted vis-à-vis Orders of Recovery Tribunals – Yet Again The following news item is self explanatory. We have been holding such contentions past several years. DRTs being the trial courts first must determine the facts judicially and then only there will be function of higher courts. Writ jurisdiction ousted vis-a vis orders of recovery tribunals- yet again!! http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ef6ff727-5a54-4f8b-8819-9bded4fdabc6 · March 15 2013 Introduction The Supreme Court in the recent judgment of T. P. Vishnu Kumar v. Canara Bank P.N. Road, Tiruppur and Ors1. reiterated the principle that when specific remedy is made available to a party, invocation of writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is not permissible in matters of recovery of debts. Writ jurisdiction of the Court cannot be invoked to test the validity/correctness of every interim order passed by the Debt Recovery Tribunal (“DRT”) under the provisions of the Recovery of Debts due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 (“Act”). Factual Matrix The present case arises from an appeal against the Madras High Court (“Mad HC”) Division Bench judgment2 wherein the appeals against Single Bench judgment were allowed on the ground of availability of alternate remedy under Section 20 of the Act. Canara Bank (“Respondent Bank”) had filed application before the DRT for recovery of amounts of INR 29, 68,161.93/- with interest @ 17% per annum with respect to Open Cash Credit facilities granted to T. P. Vishnu Kumar (“Appellant”) herein. These amounts were granted on the mortgage of other immovable properties and guarantee given by other partners of the partnership firm formed along with the Appellant herein. The debts were acknowledged by the Appellant however over a period of time the accounts maintained with the Respondent Bank became irregular and monies were not received leading to issuance of notices. The Appellant filed its response and submitted their inability to file detailed written statement in the absence of non-production of accounts by Respondent Bank. The Appellant filed separate interim applications seeking production of entire accounts and other relevant documentation. All the interim applications were dismissed by DRT. In furtherance thereof, the Appellant filed writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before Single Bench of Mad HC for issuance of writ of mandamus directing Canara Bank to produce statement of accounts. The Appellant contended that merits of the matter should be decided in a trial and same cannot be dealt with at the interim stage. Further, such applications cannot be admitted without entire documents being submitted as the same were absolutely necessary for filing detailed written statement. The Respondent Bank contended that the Tribunal is permitted to make such orders and give directions on discovery and production as it deems fit. The Single Bench held that non-furnishing of documents amounted to prejudice against the Petitioner and allowed the writ petition directing the Respondent Bank to submit the documents. The said decision was appealed by Respondent Bank before Division Bench as despite alternate remedy prevailing under the Act writ jurisdiction was invoked. The appeal was allowed leading to the present petition before the Supreme Court. Issue The only issue to be determined before the SC was whether existence of alternate remedy barred invoking the jurisdiction of the civil court. Judgment and Analysis The SC held that writ petitions cannot be filed in case of recovery of dues unless there exists any statutory violation or proceedings are conducted in an arbitrary, unreasonable and unfair manner. If the Act itself provides for a mechanism or an alternate remedy, writ jurisdiction of the High Court cannot be invoked as the same would defeat the very objective of enacting a separate statute and establishing a specialized Tribunal. The purpose of the Act was ensuring speedy recovery of bank dues. Due to severe delay in adjudicating and disposing such cases, banks and financial institutions like any other litigants were subjected to go through a process of pursuing the cases for recovery through civil courts for unduly long periods, leading to the trapping of crores of rupees in litigation proceedings, which the banks could not re-advance, leading to enactment of the Act and DRT to assure expeditious recovery proceedings and speedy adjudication of matters concerning debt recovery of banks. The Tiwari Committee which recommended the constitution of a Special Tribunal for recovery of debts due to banks and financial institutions stated in its report that the exclusive jurisdiction of the Tribunal must relate not only in regard to the adjudication of the liability but also in regard to the execution proceedings. Section 17 of the Act provides that the DRT shall have jurisdiction to “entertain and decide applications from banks and financial institutions for recovery of debts due to such banks and financial institutions and Section 18 of the Act clearly bars the jurisdiction of other authorities and courts except the Supreme Court and High Courts under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution. It is a settled law that any provision ousting the jurisdiction of civil court must be strictly construed3. The Tribunals and the Appellate Tribunals established to bring about special procedural mechanism for speedy recovery of the dues of banks and financial institutions have also made provision for ensuring that defaulting borrowers are not able to invoke the jurisdiction of Civil Courts for frustrating the proceedings initiated by the banks and other financial institutions. The SC in Allahabad Bank vs. Canara Bank & Anr4. held that the Act confers exclusive jurisdiction on the Tribunal. That being the position, the parties have to agitate their grievances only before the said forum, DRT and not before this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution or any other forum. Further, the said law was reiterated again in Punjab National Bank vs. O. C. Krishnan & Ors5. , wherein the SC held that “the Act was enacted with a view to provide a special procedure for recovery of debts due to the banks and the financial institutions. There is a hierarchy of appeal provided in the Act, itself namely, filing of an appeal under Section 20 and this fast-track procedure cannot be allowed to be derailed either by taking recourse to proceedings under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution or by filing a civil suit, which is expressly barred. Even though a provision under an Act cannot expressly oust the jurisdiction of the court under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, nevertheless, when there is an alternative remedy available, judicial prudence demands that the Court refrains from exercising its jurisdiction under the said constitutional provisions.” The Supreme Court in Kohinoor Creations and Ors. v.Syndicate Bank6 held that all matters within the purview of the Act are to be dealt by the specialized tribunal, DRT and Appellate Tribunal constituted only for this purpose and no other body or forum can deal with these disputes. The bar of civil court thus applies to all such matters which may be taken cognizance of by the DRT. Not only in relation to the applicability of the Act and approaching DRT, the SC in United Bank of India vs Satyawathi Tondon and Ors7. observed that it is a matter of serious concern that despite repeated pronouncements, the High Court’s continue to ignore the availability of statutory remedies under the DRT and Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (“SARFAESI Act”) and exercise jurisdiction under Article 226 for passing orders which have serious adverse impact on the right of banks and other financial institutions to recover their dues. It is surprising to note that the Mad HC in the past has itself ruled against approaching civil courts; invoking writ jurisdiction in case of recovery of debts by banks8 however had allowed it in the present case. The present judgment is one more attempt to clarifying the law and creating awareness among the litigants in relation to recovery of dues from banks and financial institutions. Failing to nip the bud of frivolous invocation of writ remedy under Article 226 and 227, in this case resulted in a delay of more than five years. If justice delayed is justice denied, then justice has certainly been denied to Canara Bank despite SC’s proverbial rap on Mad HC’s (single bench) knuckles. (3) Jewish Wisdom
Mr Firoz Poonawalla has sent the following interesting Jews Proverbs:- Jewish WisdomEVER COME ACROSS JEWISH PROVERBS? HERE ARE SOME FROM THE RACE THAT HAVE, PERCENTAGE WISE, PRODUCED MORE NOBEL PRIZE WINNERS THAN ANY OTHER RACE! If the rich could hire other people to die for them, the poor could make a wonderful living. ≈ Yiddish Proverb The wise man, even when he holds his tongue, says more than the fool when he speaks. ≈ Yiddish Proverb What you don't see with your eyes, don't invent with your mouth. ≈ Yiddish proverb A hero is someone who can keep his mouth shut when he is right. ≈ Yiddish Proverb One old friend is better than two new ones. ≈ Yiddish Proverb One of life's greatest mysteries is how the boy who wasn't good enough to marry your daughter can be the father of the smartest grandchild in the world. ≈ Jewish Proverb A wise man hears one word and understands two. ≈ Yiddish Proverb "Don't be so humble - you are not that great." ≈ Golda Meir (1898-1978) to a visiting diplomat Pessimism is a luxury that a Jew can never allow himself. ≈ Golda Meir Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex. It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction. ≈ Albert Einstein Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving. ≈ Albert Einstein Intellectuals solve problems; geniuses prevent them. ≈ Albert Einstein You can't control the wind, but you can adjust your sails. ≈ Yiddish proverb I don't want to become immortal through my work. I want to become immortal through not dying. ≈ Woody Allen Imagination is more important than knowledge. ≈ Sign hanging in Einstein's office at Princeton. We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them. ≈ Albert Einstein
DRT Solutions Weekly Mail – 254th Issue dated 22nd March ‘13 All Weekly mails right from 1st Issue to latest, click links below:-
(1) Useful / Favourable Judgment to Borrowers & Guarantors
Following is the extract from our web page vide link
http://www.drtsolutions.com/
Our presentation of useful / favourable judgments to Borrowers and Guarantors has been widely appreciated by our clients and visitors of our web site. We received several phone calls and mails appreciating utility of such information and web content. Our selection, content and comments have been liked by one and all. Full text with red content has been greatly appreciated. As a result the above web page has occupied top ranking in important search engines in a short period for the keyword ‘DRT Judgments’. We request our patrons to send us soft copies of useful and favourable judgments to borrowers and guarantors, if possible important content marked with red. We shall examine the same and if it is found useful to one and all, we shall publish the same.
Please give a wide publicity to the above web page among your
colleagues, friends, entrepreneurs, borrowers, guarantors etc so that
they also go through such important judgments and apprise the legal
community including the advocates for presentation in court of law and
DRTs. Such efforts will definitely improve not only the banks but the
judiciary as a whole. (2) SC Useful Judgment – on Valuation, Sale, Auction & Disposal of Properties
Following is the extract from our web page vide link
http://www.drtsolutions.com/
Comments by DRT Legal Solutions
The full text of the
judgment is given on our web site vide link http://www.drtsolutions.com/ “8 Undoubtedly, public money should be recovered and recovery should be made expeditiously. But it does not mean that the Financial Institutions which are concerned only with the recovery of their loans, may be permitted to behave like property dealers and be permitted further to dispose off the secured assets in any unreasonable or arbitrary manner in flagrant violation of statutory provisions. 9. A right to hold property is a constitutional right as well as a human right. A person cannot be deprived of his property except in accordance with the provisions of statute. (Vide: Lachhman Dass v. Jagat Ram, (2007) 10 S.C.C. 448; and Narmada Bachao Andolan v. State of Madhya Pradesh, A.I.R. 2011 S.C. 1589). Thus, the condition precedent for taking away someone's property or disposing off the secured assets, is that the authority must ensure compliance of the statutory provisions.” “17. In view of the above, it is evident that there must be an application of mind by the authority concerned while approving/ accepting the report of the approved valuer and fixing the reserve price, as the failure to do so may cause substantial injury to the borrower/guarantor and that would amount to material irregularity and ultimately vitiate the subsequent proceedings.” “19. Thus, in view of the above, it is evident that law requires a proper valuation report; its acceptance by the authority concerned by application of mind and then fIxing the reserve price accordingly ~"1d acceptance of the auction bid taking into consideration that there was no possibility of collusion of the bidders. The authority is duty bound to decide as to whether sale of part of the property would meet the outstanding demand. Valuation is a question of fact and valuation of the property is required to be determined fairly and reasonably.”
20. - - there must be a proper valuation report, which should be
communicated to the judgment debtor and he should me his own valuation
report and the sale should be conducted in accordance with law. After
confirmation of sale, there should be issuance of sale certificate.
Court cannot interfere unless it is found that some material
irregularity in the conduct of sale has been committed. The Court
further held that it should not be a forced sale. A valuer's report
should be as good as the actual offer and the variation should be within
limit. Such estimate should be done carefully. The Court further held
that unless the Court is satisfied about the adequacy of the price the
act of confirmation of the sale would not be a proper exercise of
judicial discretion (3) DRT Recovery Officer suspended– CBI Case – charged with undervaluing Properties before Auction Former officer seeks discharge from caseCBI accused him of undervaluing properties before auctioning S. Kasimayan, a former Recovery Officer of Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT), has moved the Madras High Court Bench here to get himself discharged from a case registered by Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on charges of undervaluing a few immovable properties in collusion with a bank manager and auction purchasers. According to the petitioner, he was appointed as Assistant Civilian Staff in the Ministry of Defence on March 16, 1998 through the Union Public Service Commission. He was posted at the DRT on deputation on May 30, 2007 and worked there until being repatriated to his parent department on August 27, 2010 due to the criminal case registered by the CBI. Thereafter, he was suspended from service since August 24, 2011 as the CBI had filed a charge sheet against him before a Special Court for trying CBI cases here. The charges were under Sections 409 (criminal breach of trust by a public servant) and 420 (cheating) of the Indian Penal Code, apart from provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act. According to the prosecution, Mr. Kasimayan was entrusted with the responsibility of executing a recovery certificate issued by a DRT at Mumbai, with respect to loans borrowed from Chembur branch of Dhanalakshmi Bank in Mumbai, as some of the properties owned by the borrower were situated in Madurai. The properties here were auctioned for Rs. 16.6 lakh on April 24, 2008. On March 30, 2009, the CBI registered the case against the petitioner and five others and accused them of conspiring together and adopting a 15-month-old valuation report for the purpose of setting upset price during the auction. The alleged malpractice had caused a loss of Rs. 4.29 lakh to the owner of the properties. In July 2011, Mr. Kasimayan approached the Special Court for discharging him from the case on the ground that his actions were covered under judicial immunity. However, the Special Court rejected the plea on November 2 last year and hence the present criminal revision petition. In parallel, P. Rajesh Kannan of Usilampatti near here, the auction purchaser of the properties, also filed a case to set aside the criminal proceedings. Justice Aruna Jagadeesan has clubbed both the cases and posted them for h on March 13. Keywords: S. Kasimayan, former DRT officer, Madras High Court, Madurai Bench, CBI case (4) Has India failed because of its Judicial System?
Mr. Ajay Khemka, one of our clients from Bangalore has sent the following relevant news item:- Has India failed because of its Judicial System?
http://www.ibtl.in/news/
The protests in Delhi about the brutal gang rape of a 23 year old girl
are more than just a spontaneous outpouring of grief over the victim.
The citizens of this country are seething with rage over a callous
unresponsive government and judiciary. (5) ICE (In Case of Emergency) Campaign
Mr. Firoz Poonawalla has sent following very useful information:-- Something important for a change !!!! Isn't it true that we all carry our mobile phones with hundreds of names/numbers stored in its memory but yet nobody, other than ourselves, know which of these numbers belong to our near and dear ones? Let us for a moment create a scenario wherein (God forbid) We are involved in an accident or had a heart attack and the people attending to us get hold of our mobile phone but don't know which number to call to inform our family members.
Yes, there are hundreds of numbers stored but which one is the contact person in case of an emergency?
For this reason, we must have one or more telephone numbers stored Under the name ICE (In case of Emergency) in our mobile phones. Read below for more details..... .
As cell phones are carried by majority of the population, all you need to do is store the number of a contact person or person who should be contacted at during emergency as "ICE"(meaning In Case of Emergency ). The idea was thought up by a paramedic who found that when they went to the scenes of accidents, there were always mobile phones with patients, but they didn't know which number to call.
He therefore thought that it would be a good idea if there was a nationally recognized name for this purpose. Following a disaster in London , the East Anglican Ambulance Service has launched a national "In case of Emergency (ICE)" campaign . In an emergency situation, Emergency Service personnel and hospital staff would then be able to quickly contact your next of kin, by simply dialing the number stored as "ICE" .
Please forward this. It won't take too many "forwards" before every body will know about this.
For more than one contact name simply enter ICE1 , ICE2 andICE3 etc. A great idea that will make a difference! Let's spread the concept of ICE by storing an ICE number in our mobile phones today!
DRT Solutions Weekly Mail – 253rd Issue dated 15th March ‘13 All Weekly mails right from 1st Issue to latest, click links on top of this page
(1) DRT Important Judgment - Notice u/s 13(4) is Must before initiating Action u/s 14 - Karnataka H.C. - K.R. Krishnegowda vs Authorised Officer, 2013(1) Bankers' Journal 382 –
Following is the extract from our web page vide link
http://www.drtsolutions.com/
(a) Full
text of the this very useful DRT judgment for the borrowers has been
given on our web site vide linkhttp://www.drtsolutions.com/ (b) It is observed that in many cases, after issue of notice under section 13(2) and just after getting the Objection and Representation from the borrowers, the banks are approaching the Magistrate without any notice to the borrower. The Magistrate issues the order for possession and at the last moment, the possession is taken all of a sudden. As per this judgment, the notice u/s 13(4) as well as paper publication is mandatory. Hence it is one of the important judgment helpful to the borrowers. (c) In this connection it is relevant to submit that past several years we have been cautioning our clients to be in touch with the office of the Magistrate as well as to file caveat. This judgment has validated our approach.
(2) DRTs and DRATs to Introduce e-Governance
The following news items are self explanatory
DRTs and DRATs to introduce e-governance initiatives
The DRTs/DRATs has planned to implement information technology to automate the processes/procedures. As of now, the agency for the implementation of the project is yet to be decided News | by CIOL Bureau
BANGALORE, INDIA: A proposal has been initiated to introduce e-governance in Debt Recovery Tribunals (DRTs) and Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunals (DRATs). This proposal has been made to ensure smooth functioning of the DRTs and DRATs and to provide a platform for seamless operations to Banks, Financial Institutions and general public to expedite recovery of public money. The DRTs/DRATs has planned to implement information technology to automate the processes/procedures. As of now, the agency for the implementation of the project is yet to be decided, as per a written reply by Namo Narain Meena, MoS, Ministry of Finance, to a question in the Lok Sabha. As a part of this initiative, the DRT officials will be provided with technology enablers that would help them deliver best possible services efficiently and to provide hassle free administrative services. Some of the other objectives for the e-DRT engagement include the facilitation of hassle free administrative services for the applicants and defendants, making timely and accurate reports easily accessible, efficient management of case records.
The borrowers and their advocates must adopt and use most modern technology in DRTs and DRATs. This will help a lot when e-governance is introduced in these courts. We are abreast with all the aspects of such technology and have already been covering relevant factors. It is needless to mention that we had developed the technology of ‘Video Arguments’ as early as 2007, demonstrated before DJ Indore in 2007, covered the same in DRT Conference in 2008, sent proposal to the Supreme Court in 2009 etc. |
|
Configuration |
Location of tablet |
Tablet support/ basis of tilt |
Software task performed |
|
Lap-Hand |
Subject's lap |
One or both hands/ self-selected tilt |
Internet browsing, reading, game playing |
|
Lap-Case |
Subject's lap |
Case/ lower case tilt setting |
Internet browsing, reading. Email reading & responding. |
|
Table-Case |
Table surface |
Case/ lower case tilt setting |
Internet browsing, reading. Email reading & responding. |
|
Table-Case |
Table surface |
Case/ upper case tilt setting |
Movie watching. |
Biomechanical Outcomes:
The researchers measured various head and neck postures including:
|
Head & neck flexion (forward bending from vertical) | |
|
Crania-cervical angle (angle ABC where; A. C7 Vertebra, B. Ear Canal, and C. Corner of Eye) | |
|
Visual Gaze Angle (angle from horizon to eye to center of tablet screen) |
Results and Conclusions (from the study):
What this means for the ergonomics practitioner:
When
providing ergonomic advice for tablet computer users we need to consider
how the device is used, we need to consider the "work" environment, and
we need to take a systems approach to ensure that we don't optimize for
one function and cause problems in another area.
Tablet computers can be used to consume content such as when reading or
viewing a video, and they can be used to create content such as when
inputting text or other media. Consuming and creating each place
different demands on the user and may require different placement
configurations depending on the duration, frequency, and importance of
the task.
If the device is used primarily to consume media such as viewing video or reading web pages, then we want to optimize position for viewing. This means:
|
Place the device higher than the lap (raise it up with a pillow, book or other object) | |
|
Tilt the screen toward the eyes | |
|
Place the device at an appropriate viewing distance to avoid forward bending. | |
|
If the device must be hand-held, consider an armrest or pillow under the arm to prevent arm and shoulder fatigue. |
If the device is primarily being used to create or input content, then we need to balance the positioning to accommodate the visual system and the hand/wrist/ arm.
|
Placing the device flat on the desk is great for the hand/ arm but will result in neck flexion. | |
|
Tilting the device up can help reach a balance between the two systems. However, placing the device up on a sharp angle may result in wrist extension and strain. In this instance we need to think of the tablet more as a writing pad, and consider the benefits of positioning the device on a gentle up slope much like the artist or engineer did when using a drafting table. | |
|
For intensive inputting (keying), consider using an external keyboard that links with Bluetooth connections. |
Reference
Justin Young, Matthieu Trudeau, Dan Odell, KIm Marinelli, and Jack Dennerlein, "Touch-screen tablet user configurations and case-supported tilt affect head and neck flexion angles," Work: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment and Rehabilitation, Volume 41, Number 1, 2012.
At the time this review was written the article was available free of charge from:
http://iospress.metapress.com/
About the reviewer: Gene Kay MS, CEA is a work physiologist and a
BCPE Certified Ergonomics Associate. He is a former Global Ergonomics
Manager, a former Rehab Services Manager, the Past President of the
Upper Midwest HFES, and is the owner and developer of the ErgoAdvocate
on-line training program.
![]()
DRT Solutions Weekly Mail – 251st Issue dated 1st March ‘13
All Weekly mails right from 1st Issue to latest, click links on top of this page
(1) Video Recording of Proceedings – Supreme Court to Examine
Following is the extract from our web page vide link
http://www.drtsolutions.com/
Mr. N.K. Sharma, ex-GM (Law) and our Associate has sent the following important news item:
SUPREME COURT TO EXAMINE PROPOSAL FOR VIDEO RECORDING OF PROCEEDINGS
The Supreme Court has agreed to examine a proposal for video-recording court proceedings to ensure transparency as well as cut down delays in disposal of cases. It was submitted before a Bench, headed by Justice D.K. Jain, by counsel Indira Unninayar, appearing for the Janhit Manch along with counsel Prashant Bhushan. At present court proceedings are largely not recorded, and if recorded, are summarized by way of orders by the presiding officers/judges. In 2008, the Janhit Manch, Common Cause, Ravi Goenka, a chartered accountant and the Lok Sewak Sangathan filed a writ petition highlighting systemic delays in the judiciary: lack of proper management, inadequate judge strength and infrastructure, including a very limited budget allocation of 0.2 percent even though justice is guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. Besides the Union of India, all the States and Union territories are listed as respondents. Though the case was listed several times, it was only last week that the Bench asked the petitioners to submit a proposal as to the practice prevalent in other countries. In these submissions, the petitioners said: "Through videography, which is cheap (Rs. 100 per litigant), the opacity in the system and delays will reduce considerably… With a tiny mechanical device, you will have records of proceedings, something taken for granted in many countries but absent from ours." The purpose "is to ensure that there are proper and accurate court records so that the lis/ dispute is properly addressed. Also the conduct of various stakeholders, including, that of persons seeking and obtaining adjournments, for the asking, is recorded. Perjury and contempt that are routine will get addressed. And there will be increased confidence in the system." The petitioners pointed out that video-recording was being done in Australia and New Zealand. In the U.S., there was a proposal to video-record court proceedings, and a three-year pilot project, in which 14 federal trial courts volunteered to participate, was under way. In the U.K., the Supreme Court's proceedings were being televised. Audio recordings/transcripts of proceedings were available, subject to permission. The petitioners said introduction of video-recording would be a big step towards transparency, equality and realization of quick justice. The case will come up for hearing in February 2013.
Our Comments
(a) In this connection it is worth mentioning that we have developed the process of Video Arguments which was demonstrated before the District Judge, Indore as early as 2007, presented in the Conference at Chennai in 2007, discussed in All India DRT Conference held in indore in 2008, proposal sent to the Supreme Court in 2008, and was also presented before the All India CAs conference held at Indore in 2009 etc.
(b) It is relevant to note that all oral arguments are recorded in US courts since 1935 and even after 75 years we are still talking about it.
(c) There are 73 countries whose Judicial systems are better that us. That is why we have been emphasizing that the litigant borrowers will have to make special efforts to secure justice by being alert and vigilant at every moment of trial which just can not be left to the Govt and the legal community i.e. Govt, Ministry of Law, Advocates, Judges, Bar Council, and Law Colleges which appear to have no committed desire to improve as may be seen from more than 3 crore pending cases in civil courts as well as open violations committed by Ministry of Finance in not transferring the control of DRTs despite 15 years old verdict of the Supreme Court.
(2) Debt Recovery – A Point of View
Following is the extract from our web page vide link
http://www.drtsolutions.com/
The following news article presents another perspective:-
Both lenders and borrowers use legal armoury to serve their interests
In a detailed judgment last month, the Supreme Court (SC) lamented the plight of debt recovery tribunals (DRT) that are set up in almost every sector, and then left to fend for themselves. The government does not release funds, and the tribunals are in a state of suspended animation without enough members, staff or buildings. In a triumph of hope over experience, the SC set forth a series of measures for the government to make these bodies functional (Union of India vs DRT Bar Association).
Last week, the SC came across a 12-year-old litigation, described as a "classic case" of debt recovery. The judgment said it showed "how the parties can protract proceedings in fiscal matters. Parties as well as the system have contributed to the delay. At every state of the proceedings, there was delay" (T P Vishnu Kumar vs Canara Bank).
In 2002, the bank moved DRT, Coimbatore, for the recovery of debt from a firm. The debtors asked the bank to produce extracts of accounts and transactions relating to banking transactions. The bank opposed the request, arguing that it was not germane to the dispute. The tribunal rejected the demand for documents observing that it was meant to delay the proceedings. Already five years had gone by. The borrowers moved the Madras High Court. One bench found the request of the borrowers reasonable. On appeal, a division bench found the other bench wrong. Three more years had rolled by. The appeal in the Supreme Court took another three years.
It was not curtains for the litigation, however. The judgment said: "The case stands at the stage at which it was filed, not an inch forward." Now, Canara Bank does not have to produce the documents. But the main issues will have to be argued from page one.
Tracing the history of debt recovery laws, the Supreme Court recalled that DRTs were created by the Recovery of Debts due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act in 1993. Civil courts were found unable to handle the millions of cases coming up before them. At the time of setting up the tribunals, there were more than 1.5 million cases filed by public sector banks and 304 moved by financial institutions. They involved Rs 5,622 crore then. Non-performing assets have doubled from 2009 to 2012. Ingenuity of borrowers and their lawyers also kept pace.
Courts have contributed their share to the chaos. In the Canara Bank case, the high court interfered with the tribunal's order rejecting the demand of the borrowers for a series of documents from the bank. The high court has no power to do so. The Supreme Court chastised the high court for interfering with the interim order of DRT. If the high court interferes in every interim order of DRT, the purpose of establishing such tribunals will be lost. "Owing to the intervention of the writ court, the matter got delayed for four years, defeating the very purpose and object of the Act," the judgment said.
The Debt Recovery Act empowers banks and financial institutions to move the tribunal in the interest of speedy proceedings. However, the borrower can raise disputes over their claims in a civil court. Whether the civil case can be transferred to the tribunal or not is a question on which the Supreme Court has given two contrary judgments three years ago. Thus, the issue can be further complicated by borrowers.
When the Act was found inadequate to meet the ingenuity of borrowers, Parliament passed the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Security Interest Act in 2002. The provisions are so harsh that financial institutions can play Shylock. In a recent judgment (Palpap Software International vs Indian Bank), the Madras High Court described the case before it as "a classic example of misuse of the provisions of the Act by the secured creditor". The auction of the mortgaged property was reduced to a "mockery".
The judgment said: "The bank is expected to conduct the procedure in a bona fide manner. The attempt of the bank should be to auction property for the maximum amount and adjust it towards the dues, and refund the excess to the borrower."
Cases involving debt recovery are flooding the courts, despite the new laws. Often such litigation is intertwined with other legislation like the Sick Industries Act, which has been found to be amenable to gross misuse, the Negotiable Instruments Act dealing with bounced cheques and liquidation proceedings. These laws are used more as battering rams against each other than for settling disputes. The whole thing can be made into a knotty bundle by lenders and borrowers, which the hierarchy of courts would take years to unscramble. In their minds, the judges might be repeating Shakespeare's line, "Neither a borrower nor a lender be."
(3) Calming the Mind
Following is the extract from our web page vide link
http://www.drtsolutions.com/
Mr. Firoz Poonawalla has sent the following useful information:-
Don't give your mind permission to get disturbed.
A disturbed mind is easily influenced.
This will cost you your peace.
Learn to maintain your peace by freeing yourself
from attachments.
Competing or comparing yourself with others
will not allow you to focus inwards.
An inner focus allows you to keep your eye on your higher self.
Remember your original nature.
It allows you to forge a link with the Divine.
Then it becomes easy to recognize useless thoughts and
replace them with a spiritual perspective.
A calm mind is not just peaceful,
it is focused, self-directing and Divine.
![]()
│Contents│Products & Services│Frequently Asked Questions│Useful Legal Material│Useful Article-Borrowers│Useful Article-Guarantors│RBI Guidelines│Notes-Law of Torts│Notes-Damages│News & Views│MiniArticles-Letters to Editor│DRT Cases Handled by Us│Useful Interactions with Clients & Visitors│Securitisation Act-Comments│About Us-DRT Solutions│Update after last Release | Useful Tips for DRT Advocates|| 138 NI Act - Dishonour of Cheques | Our US Joint Venture with Anand Ahuja Associates | NCLT, National Company Law Tribunal, BIFR, SICA | Video Interview - BS Malik, Sr. Supreme Court Advocate│Legal Forum of India│Our Attorney Associates & Well Wishers│Success & Results of Our Guidance│DRT Orders in favour of Borrowers & Guarantors│NPA, Debt due, Rehabilitation of Sick SME Industries│Our Replies to Queries on Current DRT Matters, Court Decisions etc.│Measure of damages & Calculations under Torts & Contracts│Video Interview - GC Garg, Ex-Senior Bank Official│Solar Healing, Yoga, Projector, Rebirth etc.│Swami Ramdev, Yoga Guru, Cure for All Diseases, Medical Science Revolution│Court Technologies IT Presentation Video Arguments│Archive│DRT Solutions Weekly Mail for Borrowers & Guarantors │ All India DRT Conference 2011 at Indore│Article by Ram Kishan on Management & Technology in Indian Judiciary│Excise causing Damages due to Defamation & Wrong Doings
![]()
DRT Legal Solutions
Attorneys at Law of Torts, Injury and IPR Claims
Contact Information :- Phones (India):- Mobile- +91-930-2103689, Off. & Res.- +91-731-4049358 and +91-731-3290201, Online Chat Yahoo Messenger - ID - ramkishan_drt - time to be fixed in advance on phone.
E-mail - ramkishandrt@gmail.com and ramkishan@drtsolutions.com
Our Additional Web Site address:- We have received additional web site address as www.drt.in which will be linked to this site only. As a whole you may approach us for all DRT Problems and Solutions
(2) We have created a separate web site www.usindolegal.com which deals exclusively with our US joint venture enterprise for activities like BPO, legal BPO, DRT etc. This site has started appearing in the search results of Google, Mamma, Alexa and Yahoo.
Application of Law of Torts in claiming Damages from Municipal Corporations for demolition of structures, closure of shops etc:- In many parts of the country, the Municipal Corporations are demolishing structures like shops and houses which existed for number of years. The shops existing for number of years are proposed to be shut down. The affected persons should claim Damages under the Law of Torts, which would be substantial. It is learnt that in Delhi itself about 5 lac shops are to be closed down and about 25 lac persons would be out of jobs. All these persons should file damage suits in the civil court. Since the damages would be substantial, the suits may be filed as Indigent Persons. Since the damages would attract interest, the usual delay by the civil courts will not affect the final outcome. The affected shop owners may discuss the details with us on phone.
Our Articles for Borrowers and Guarantors:- Our articles on DRT matters have been published in the Financial Express. The All India Manufacturers Organisation in its famous web site www.aimoindia.org has reproduced copies of our four articles. These original articles can be searched in the archive of the Financial Express in its web site www.financialexpress.com Two of these articles have been reproduced in other pages of this web site.
Useful link www.WorldVideoBusiness.com :- WorldVideoBusiness-WVB® is a business to business e-marketplace source of international trade leads, and tender opportunities from companies and government organizations around the globe.
About Us in Brief :- (1) We specialize in DRT (Debt Recovery Tribunal) and NCLT (National Company Law Tribunal) matters. As a whole you may approach us for all DRT Problems and Solutions as well as matters connected with ARCIL i.e. Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Limited, We have a Joint Venture with an America based law firm for various activities like BPO, legal BPO and DRT. The details of the said American firm and the joint venture may be seen at the page - Our US Joint Venture with Anand Ahuja Associates or in www.usindolegal.com (2) For your all problems including those in DRT, please phone us or send e-mail. Please give your contact details along with your problems in brief. As a whole you may approach us for all DRT Problems and Solutions. (2) With our Legal Opinion, you need not worry about the Securitisation Act or other DRT matters or NCLT. Please visit the page Products & Services and Frequently Asked Questions (3) On account of our expertise in the Law of Torts and Banking and experience past 15 years, we can help you to submit suitable defence with winning strategy in DRT cases, Securitisation Act, Guarantors' defence etc. (4) We need only copies of all available documents to render our expert 'Legal Opinion' which will be quite useful and valuable to you particularly in DRT i.e. Debt recovery Tribunal. (5) We have also handled assignments for preparation of damage claims against Electricity Boards, Insurance Companies, Municipal Corporations etc. all on the basis of the Law of Torts. (6) The DRT counterclaims is to be prepared well in advance so that it could be raised at proper time in DRT or other forum to safeguard the securities and assets. (7) Several DRT counterclaims drafted by us are being handled by different advocates at DRT Mumbai, DRT Delhi, DRT Jabalpur etc. Thus DRT advocates are available in these cities. Cases in other Debt Recovery Tribunals are under process. (8) This site is updated monthly mostly on every first Monday of the month or for urgent release on any day with latest material. (9) For further details about us, please visit the page About Us-DRT Solutions As a whole you may approach us for all DRT Problems and Solutions. We hail from the place to which Maharishi Mahesh Yogi and Acharya Rajnish belong and hence this site is dedicated to them.
Our this web site is dedicated to Yoga Rishi Baba Ramdev Ji Maharaj:- Our this web site is respectfully dedicated to Yoga Rishi Baba Ramdev Ji Maharaj whose method of Pranayam has cured even incurable diseases and thus has revolutionized modern medical science. For further details please visit our special page by clicking here Baba Ramdev Ji Maharaj, Yoga Guru, Cure for All Diseases, Medical Science Revolution
Site also dedicated to:- (1) H.H. Maharishi Mahesh Yogi and Acharya Rajnish, the greatest gurus of all time www.maharishi.com, www.osho.com
(2) Shri Hira Ratan Manek (HRM) for his pioneering work on Solar healing vide his web site www.solarhealing.com and forum at www.lifemysteries.com
We regularly practice TM and SCI of Maharishi Mahesh Yogi. We also regularly practice Hath Yoga including Pranayam based on Baba Ramdev Ji Maharaj. We daily watch his global TV program on Astha Channel from 05:30 AM to 8AM and 8PM to 9PM Indian Standards Time. Many chronic diseases such as Cancer, Parkinsons' disease, Polio, Asthma, Hypertension, diabetes etc. have been cured by his method of Pranayam which can be learnt even by watching his program on TV. Since 30th March '06, we have started practicing Sun Gazing as prescribed by HRM.
(3) Shri Satyanarayan Morya alias 'Babaji' for his praiseworthy service to our nation. Please visit his site www.artistbaba.com
Disclaimer:- We have no branch or setup other than at Indore. It is observed that some persons are using name of our firm as well as name of our web site. We have not given any such authority to anyone to do so. Under such facts and circumstances, if anybody suffers any loss, we shall not be responsible. If such instance comes to notice of someone, we may kindly be informed.
Last Modified:- Please see the top of the Home Page
Copyright © 2001-2010 - DRT Legal Solutions, India. All rights reserved.
|
DRT Legal Solutions
Attorneys at Law of Torts, Injury and IPR Claims t Home│Contents│Products & Services│Frequently Asked Questions│Useful Legal Material│Useful Article-Borrowers│Useful Article-Guarantors│RBI Guidelines│Notes-Law of Torts│Notes-Damages│News & Views│MiniArticles-Letters to Editor│DRT Cases Handled by Us│Useful Interactions with Clients & Visitors│Securitisation Act-Comments│About Us-DRT Solutions│Update after last Release| Useful Tips for DRT Advocates | 138 NI Act - Dishonour of Cheques | Our US Joint Venture with Anand Ahuja Associates | NCLT, National Company Law Tribunal, BIFR, SICA | Synopsis Video Interview - BS Malik, Sr. Supreme Court Advocate│Indian Legal Forum for Industrialists & Businessmen│Our Attorney Associates & Well Wishers│Success & Results of Our Guidance│DRT Orders in favour of Borrowers & Guarantors│NPA, Debt due, Rehabilitation of Sick SME Industries│Our Replies to Queries on Current DRT Matters, Court Decisions etc.│Measure of damages & Calculations under Torts & Contracts│Video Interview - GC Garg, Ex-Senior Bank Official│Solar Healing, Projector, etc.│Baba Ramdev Ji Maharaj, Yoga Guru, Cure for All Diseases, Medical Science Revolution│Court Technologies IT Presentation Video Arguments│Archive│DRT Solutions Weekly Mail for Borrowers & Guarantors│All India DRT Conferarence 2011 at Indore│Article by Ram Kishan on Management & Technology in Indian Judiciary│SARFAESI Securitisation Securitization Actar SA NPA│DRT Judgments Favorable / Useful for Borrowers & Guarantors│OA Dismissal - Patna HC Judgment - SA Pending
Contact Information :- Phones (India):- Mobile- +91-930-2103689, Off. & Res.- +91-731-4049358 and +91-731-3290201, Online Chat Yahoo Messenger - ID - ramkishan_drt - time to be fixed in advance on phone. E-mail - ramkishandrt@gmail.com and ramkishan@drtsolutions.com Popularity of our web site :- The key word for search of our website is 'drt' or any phrase commencing with 'drt' We are on the top in Google Search for 'drt' among 28,60,000 results globally. In most of the search engines like yahoo, msn, google, excite, altavista, mamma, alexa etc., To verify, you may visit www.yahoo.com, www.msn.com, www.rediff.com, www.indiatimes.com, www.altavista.com, www.google.com, www.excite.com, www.hotbot.com, www.123india.com, www.aol.com, etc. Our reference appears in www.economictimes.com, www.amazon.com, www.financialexpress.com, www.lawcrawler.com, www.findlaw.com, www.law.com, www.supremecourtofindia.com, www.supremecourtonline.com,(2) We have created a separate web site www.usindolegal.com which deals exclusively with our US joint venture enterprise for activities like BPO, legal BPO, DRT etc. This site has started appearing in the search results of Google, Mamma, Alexa and Yahoo. Application of Law of Torts in claiming Damages from Municipal Corporations for demolition of structures, closure of shops etc:- In many parts of the country, the Municipal Corporations are demolishing structures like shops and houses which existed for number of years. The shops existing for number of years are proposed to be shut down. The affected persons should claim Damages under the Law of Torts, which would be substantial. It is learnt that in Delhi itself about 5 lac shops are to be closed down and about 25 lac persons would be out of jobs. All these persons should file damage suits in the civil court. Since the damages would be substantial, the suits may be filed as Indigent Persons. Since the damages would attract interest, the usual delay by the civil courts will not affect the final outcome. The affected shop owners may discuss the details with us on phone. Our Articles for Borrowers and Guarantors:- Our articles on DRT matters have been published in the Financial Express. The All India Manufacturers Organisation in its famous web site www.aimoindia.org has reproduced copies of our four articles. These original articles can be searched in the archive of the Financial Express in its web site www.financialexpress.com Two of these articles have been reproduced in other pages of this web site. Useful link www.WorldVideoBusiness.com :- WorldVideoBusiness-WVB® is a business to business e-marketplace source of international trade leads, and tender opportunities from companies and government organizations around the globe. About Us in Brief :- (1) We specialize in DRT (Debt Recovery Tribunal) and NCLT (National Company Law Tribunal) matters. As a whole you may approach us for all DRT Problems and Solutions as well as matters connected with ARCIL i.e. Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Limited, We have a Joint Venture with an America based law firm for various activities like BPO, legal BPO and DRT. The details of the said American firm and the joint venture may be seen at the page - Our US Joint Venture with Anand Ahuja Associates or in www.usindolegal.com (2) For your all problems including those in DRT, please phone us or send e-mail. Please give your contact details along with your problems in brief. As a whole you may approach us for all DRT Problems and Solutions. (2) With our Legal Opinion, you need not worry about the Securitisation Act or other DRT matters or NCLT. Please visit the page Products & Services and Frequently Asked Questions (3) On account of our expertise in the Law of Torts and Banking and experience past 15 years, we can help you to submit suitable defence with winning strategy in DRT cases, Securitisation Act, Guarantors' defence etc. (4) We need only copies of all available documents to render our expert 'Legal Opinion' which will be quite useful and valuable to you particularly in DRT i.e. Debt recovery Tribunal. (5) We have also handled assignments for preparation of damage claims against Electricity Boards, Insurance Companies, Municipal Corporations etc. all on the basis of the Law of Torts. (6) The DRT counterclaims is to be prepared well in advance so that it could be raised at proper time in DRT or other forum to safeguard the securities and assets. (7) Several DRT counterclaims drafted by us are being handled by different advocates at DRT Mumbai, DRT Delhi, DRT Jabalpur etc. Thus DRT advocates are available in these cities. Cases in other Debt Recovery Tribunals are under process. (8) This site is updated monthly mostly on every first Monday of the month or for urgent release on any day with latest material. (9) For further details about us, please visit the page About Us-DRT Solutions As a whole you may approach us for all DRT Problems and Solutions. We hail from the place to which Maharishi Mahesh Yogi and Acharya Rajnish belong and hence this site is dedicated to them. Our this web site is dedicated to Yoga Rishi Baba Ramdev Ji Maharaj:- Our this web site is respectfully dedicated to Yoga Rishi Baba Ramdev Ji Maharaj whose method of Pranayam has cured even incurable diseases and thus has revolutionized modern medical science. For further details please visit our special page by clicking here Baba Ramdev Ji Maharaj, Yoga Guru, Cure for All Diseases, Medical Science Revolution Site also dedicated to:- (1) Swami Ramdevji, Acharya Balkishan and their Guru Pradumn Maharaj. (2) H.H. Maharishi Mahesh Yogi and Acharya Rajnish, the greatest gurus of all time www.maharishi.com, www.osho.com (3) Shri Hira Ratan Manek (HRM) for his pioneering work on Solar healing vide his web site www.solarhealing.com and forum at www.lifemysteries.com We regularly practice TM and SCI of Maharishi Mahesh Yogi. We also regularly practice Hath Yoga including Pranayam based on Baba Ramdev Ji Maharaj. We daily watch his global TV program on Astha Channel from 05:30 AM to 8AM and 8PM to 9PM Indian Standards Time. On Sanskar channel, we daily view the discourse of Pradumn Maharaj from 4 AM to 5:30 AM. Many chronic diseases such as Cancer, Parkinsons' disease, Polio, Asthma, Hypertension, diabetes etc. have been cured by the said method of Pranayam which can be learnt even by watching his program on TV. Since 30th March '06, we have started practicing Sun Gazing as prescribed by HRM. (3) Shri Satyanarayan Morya alias 'Babaji' for his praiseworthy service to our nation. Please visit his site www.artistbaba.com Disclaimer:- We have no branch or setup other than at Indore. It is observed that some persons are using name of our firm as well as name of our web site. We have not given any such authority to anyone to do so. Under such facts and circumstances, if anybody suffers any loss, we shall not be responsible. If such instance comes to notice of someone, we may kindly be informed. Last Modified:- Please see the top of the Home Page Copyright © 2001-2013 - DRT Legal Solutions, India. All rights reserved. |