DRT  Legal  Solutions

(Debts Recovery Tribunal Legal Solutions) is an India based

Law Firm specializing in DRT, Securitisation, Sarfaesi, IBC, NCLT, Borrowers and Guarantors Solutions in Debts Recovery Tribunals,

Pioneers in Counter-claims and Damage Suits based on Law of Torts and Law of Damages 

Phones (India) - Mobile - +91-9691103689, Off. & Res. +91-731-4049358

E-mail :- ramkishandrt@gmail.com  Web Site :- www.drtsolutions.com

 DRTS-22-State Bank Patiala vs Homraj Meghraj

HomeContentsProducts & ServicesFrequently Asked QuestionsUseful Article-BorrowersUseful Article-GuarantorsRBI GuidelinesNotes-Law of TortsNotes-DamagesMiniArticles-Letters to EditorUseful Interactions with Clients & VisitorsSecuritisation Act-CommentsAbout Us-DRT SolutionsUseful Tips for DRT Advocates|| 138 NI Act Cheque Dishonour Cognizance Acquittal | NCLT, National Company Law Tribunal, BIFR, SICA  |  Video Interview - BS Malik, Sr. Supreme Court AdvocateLegal Forum of IndiaSuccess & Results of Our GuidanceDRT Orders in favour of Borrowers & GuarantorsNPA, Debt due, Rehabilitation of Sick SME IndustriesOur Replies to Queries  on Current DRT Matters, Court Decisions etc.Measure of damages & Calculations under Torts & ContractsVideo Interview - GC Garg, Ex-Senior Bank OfficialSolar Healing, Yoga, Projector, Rebirth etc.Swami Ramdev, Yoga Guru, Cure for All Diseases, Medical Science RevolutionCourt Technologies IT Presentation Video ArgumentsArchiveDRT Solutions Weekly Mail for Borrowers & Guarantors   All India DRT Conference 2011 at IndoreArticle by Ram Kishan on Management & Technology in Indian JudiciarySARFAESI Securitisation Securitization Actar SA NPADRT Judgments Favourable / Useful to Borrowers  DRT Solutions - Site Map for Borrowers & GuarantorsTransform India with Modi-DRT Solutions SuggestionsLaughter Yoga by Ram Kishan, IndoreDr Kataria Indore Visit - Plan, Progress & Record  Keto Diet Vegan I.F.- Personal Experience Age 79 Yrs

Weekly Mails - 1-10  11-20  21-30  31-40  41-50  51-60  61-70  71-80 81-90 91-100 101-110 111-120 121-130 131-140 141-150 151-160 161-170 171-180 181-190 191-200 201-210 211-220 221-230 231-240 241-250 251-260  261-270  271-280 281-290 291-300 301-310 311-320 321-330 331-340 341-350 351-360 361-370 371-380 381-390 391-400 401-410 411-Latest

 

Expert in:- DRT, Counterclaim, securitization, debt recovery tribunal, NCLT  matters

 

 

 

State Bank of Patiala vs Shri Homraj Meghraj Hiranvar decided on 22.10.13 by District Magistrate, Nagpur Mr Saurav Rao

DRT Solutions Citation –  DRTS-022-State Bank Patiala vs Homraj Meghraj-2013

The entire judgment is in Marathi and its English translation is available below.

We have now numbered the Judgments published on this web site as DRTS-00. Accordingly all the judgments published so far have been numbered. This judgment has been numbered as DRTS-022.

The important extract from the said judgment in English is as under:-  

“The notice  u/s 13 (2)  sent by bank was returned "not claimed ".hence the bank should have followed rule 3 of sarfasi act for proper service of notice .Following procedure should have been followed by the bank:-  

a) Affixing of notice at the premises of guarantor                                                                             

b) Publishing of notice , one in vernacular language & one in English newspaper.                               

In this case, bank has not submitted any document showing affixation of notice at the premises of guarantor & notice has been published in English language  and in Marathi language papers. Hence bank has not followed procedure  mentioned in rule 3 of sarfasi act. Before apporoaching to this office u/s 14 of sarfasi act , bank should have followed rule 3 of sarfasi act for service of notice to the guarantor, which they have not done, hence the application of bank for taking possession of secured asset is dismissed.” 

Comments by DRT Solutions

The above mentioned Nagpur District Magistrate Judgment  lays down that since the Bank has not followed the prescribed procedure, the application u/s 14 is dismissed.

Utility of this Judgment –

As mentioned by us in the 284th issue of our Weekly Mail, the borrower should endeavor to secure opportunity to present his reply by way of counter affidavit before the CMM/DM questioning the affidavit presented by the Bank. If proper representation and objections have been raised against the notice u/s 13(2) mentioning wrong doings committed by the Bank as well as the situation of ‘No Debt Due’, it will not be possible for the Magistrate to accept the said application by the bank u/s 14 until and unless the application u/s 17 is finally decided by the DRT.

In the Court of District Magistrate, Nagpur’s Office 

Case No. 41/2011 

Applicant:             State Bank of Patiala, Nagpur.

                                -Versus- 

Non-applicant:     Shri Homraj Meghraj Hiranwar, Nagpur. 

Under Section 14 of The Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. 

(Order passed dated :  22/10/2013) 

The Authorised Officer, State Bank of Patiala, Nagpur, has filed an application under Section 14 of The Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, against non-applicant Shri Homraj Meghraj Hiranwar, for taking possession of his mortgaged property.

According to application filed by the Authorised Officer, State Bank of Patiala, Nagpur, State Bank of Patiala, Nagpur, has given loan to M/s. Kasliwal Trading Co. Pvt. Ltd., through its Director Shri Sanjay Kaluram and Smt. Sangita Sanjay Jain for business, for which the Non-applicant Shri Homraj Meghraj Hiranwar, has given his own immovable property for mortgage to the Applicant State Bank of Patiala, Nagpur, which is got securitized.  Non-applicant Shri Homraj Meghraj Hiranwar’s immovable property has been mortgaged by the applicant State Bank of Patiala, Nagpur, the particulars of which are described below :-

Description of Property

                Mouza: Wadi, Khasra No. 237/1, 239/2, Ward No. 5, Gram Panchayat House No. 4776, Plot No. 35 and house constructed thereon, Tahsil Nagpur (Gra), District: Nagpur, which is bounded as under :-

                To the East           :               Road.

                To the West          :               Road.

                To the North         :               Plot No. 34.

                To the South         :               Plot No. 35-A.

                The above described property which is situated within Nagpur District immovable property according to aforesaid Act and being securitized property,  The non-applicant having failed to repay the loan and interest accrued thereon, the Applicant State Bank of Patiala, Nagpur, has sought assistance for taking possession of aforesaid property.

                The Applicant Bank,  has sent a ‘demand notice’ dated 14/09/2009 under Section 13(2) of The Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 to the non-applicant whereby asked to deposit the outstanding loan amount along with interest accrued thereon within 60 days.  However, the aforesaid notice sent to the non-applicant returned unserved.  Therefore, the Applicant Bank published the aforesaid notice on 31/10/2009 in “Loksatta” and “Indian Express” local daily in English language in both the newspapers. 

On 23/11/2011, The Authorised Officer, State Bank of Patiala, Nagpur, has filed an application under Section 14 of The Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 in this office the case was registered.  Accordingly, in pursuance of the above,  this Tribunal has sent summons (Intimation Notice) to the applicant and non-applicant on 31.12.2011 of aforesaid matter having been registered that means given opportunity for submission of their say.  Non-applicant personally and his Advocate remained present.  To them, this Tribunal has given sufficient opportunity for filing their reply however, the applicant or his advocate have not filed their reply in this matter.  Likewise, on final hearing date, they did not remain present before this Tribunal.  But on 30/09/2013, filed reply as follows : 

“Applicant Bank’s Demand Notice under Section 13(2)  sent to the non-applicant was not served on the non-applicant same with an endorsement “Not Claimed” returned to the Applicant Bank.  Bombay High Court in Laxmi –Versus- Bhimrao’s case held that this type of service is not a valid service.  Applicant Bank Demand Notice’s copy has not affixed at the address of business of the non-applicant.  Similarly, the aforesaid notice in highly circulated two local dailies out of which one local language has not been published.  Applicant Bank has not published the possession notice in local dailies, however, actual physical possession has not been taken.   Applicant Bank, has neither sent possession notice to the non-applicant nor aforesaid notice was done chaspa outside portion of the property of the non-applicant”.

 

Applicant Bank’s Advocate remained present on the date of final hearing.  She requested this Tribunal that, the Applicant Bank, has sent a ‘demand notice’ to the non-applicant under Section 13(2) which was not served hence, the aforesaid notice published on 31/10/2009 in “Loksatta” and “Indian Express” in “English”  language in both the local daily newspapers thereby the notice was served.  To Non-applicant, for regularizing their loan account and repayment of entire loan several opportunity was given but the non-applicant failed to make the repayment of the entire loan amount, hence, the applicant bank has right to take actual physical possession of the property of the non-applicant which was mortgaged with the bank.  This Tribunal has no legal impediment to allow the applicant and prayed that the application of the applicant bank may kindly be allowed. 

Accord to Rule 3 of the aforesaid Act, “Demand Notice” for any reason whatsoever could not be served, in that event where the Secured Debtor or its (Agent) normally resides or for personal gains does works, to that house or building’s outside door or any other conspicuous place copy of the “demand notice” should be affixed and in two or more daily newspapers out of which in one daily newspaper in vernacular which is highly circulated in that locality should be published is mentioned therein. 

However, while perusing the documents filed along with the application filed by the Applicant Bank, there is no acknowledgement bearing signature of the non-applicant of “demand notice” dated 14/09/2009 sent to the non-applicant is filed on record.  The Applicant Bank in this matter has not filed any proof to show that copy of aforesaid Demand Notice having been affixed on the house or building’s outside door of the non-applicant normally resides or for personal gains does works, or at any other conspicuous place.  Likewise, the Applicant Bank has not filed any proof in order to show that the contents  of the “demand notice” in two daily newspapers out of which in one daily newspaper in vernacular which is highly circulated in that locality published in pursuance of Rule 3 before filing of application under Section 14 of the Act.  On perusal of the documents filed along with the application, it appears that The Authorised Officer of the Bank has not served the demand notice to the non-applicant in pursuance of the Rule 3. 

Therefore, I Saurabh Rao, Collector and District Magistrate, Nagpur, in terms of the power conferred under Section 14 of The Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, exercise my power and pass the following order : 

ORDER 

                The application filed by Authorised Officer, State Bank of Patiala, Nagpur, on the basis of aforesaid reasoning is rejected (disallowed) and proceedings at this stage stands closed.

                The aforesaid order passed on this 22/10/2013 under my signature and seal.

Sd/-        

(Saurabh Rao)

District Magistrate, Nagpur

(By consent of Hon’ District Magistrate)

                True copy

                Head Copyist,

                Collectorate, Nagpur.

Translated by: Adv. A.S. Murty.

 

 

horizontal rule

 

    

DRT Legal Solutions

 

Attorneys at Law of Torts, Injury and IPR Claims

HomeContentsProducts & ServicesFrequently Asked QuestionsUseful Article-BorrowersUseful Article-GuarantorsRBI GuidelinesNotes-Law of TortsNotes-DamagesMiniArticles-Letters to EditorUseful Interactions with Clients & VisitorsSecuritisation Act-CommentsAbout Us-DRT SolutionsUseful Tips for DRT Advocates|| 138 NI Act Cheque Dishonour Cognizance Acquittal | NCLT, National Company Law Tribunal, BIFR, SICA  |  Video Interview - BS Malik, Sr. Supreme Court AdvocateLegal Forum of IndiaSuccess & Results of Our GuidanceDRT Orders in favour of Borrowers & GuarantorsNPA, Debt due, Rehabilitation of Sick SME IndustriesOur Replies to Queries  on Current DRT Matters, Court Decisions etc.Measure of damages & Calculations under Torts & ContractsVideo Interview - GC Garg, Ex-Senior Bank OfficialSolar Healing, Yoga, Projector, Rebirth etc.Swami Ramdev, Yoga Guru, Cure for All Diseases, Medical Science RevolutionCourt Technologies IT Presentation Video ArgumentsArchiveDRT Solutions Weekly Mail for Borrowers & Guarantors   All India DRT Conference 2011 at IndoreArticle by Ram Kishan on Management & Technology in Indian JudiciarySARFAESI Securitisation Securitization Actar SA NPADRT Judgments Favourable / Useful to Borrowers

 

Contact Information :- Phones (India):- Mobile- +91-969-1103689, Off. & Res. +91-731-4049358,

E-mail - ramkishandrt@gmail.com and ramkishan@drtsolutions.com

Popularity of our web site :- The key word for search of our website is 'drt'  or any phrase commencing with 'drt'  We are on the top in Google Search for 'drt' among 28,60,000 results globally. In most of the search engines like yahoo, msn, google, excite, altavista, mamma, alexa etc., To verify, you may visit www.yahoo.com, www.msn.com, www.rediff.com, www.indiatimes.com, www.altavista.com, www.google.com, www.excite.com, www.hotbot.com, www.123india.com, www.aol.com, etc. Our reference appears in www.economictimes.com, www.amazon.comwww.financialexpress.com, www.lawcrawler.com, www.findlaw.com, www.law.com, www.supremecourtofindia.com, www.supremecourtonline.com

(2) We have created a separate web site www.usindolegal.com which deals exclusively with our US joint venture enterprise for activities like BPO, legal BPO, DRT etc. This site has started appearing in the search results of Google, Mamma, Alexa and Yahoo.

Application of Law of Torts in claiming Damages from Municipal Corporations for demolition of structures, closure of shops etc:- In many parts of the country, the Municipal Corporations are demolishing structures like shops and houses which existed for number of years. The shops existing for number of years are proposed to be shut down. The affected persons should claim Damages under the Law of Torts, which would be substantial. It is learnt that in Delhi itself about 5 lac shops are to be closed down and about 25 lac persons would be out of jobs. All these persons should file damage suits in the civil court. Since the damages would be substantial, the suits may be filed as Indigent Persons. Since the damages would attract interest, the usual delay by the civil courts will not affect the final outcome. The affected shop owners may discuss the details with us on phone.

Our Articles for Borrowers and Guarantors:- Our articles on DRT matters have been published in the Financial Express. The All India Manufacturers Organisation in its famous web site www.aimoindia.org has reproduced copies of our four articles. These original articles can be searched in the archive of the Financial Express in its web site www.financialexpress.com Two of these articles have been reproduced in other pages of this web site. 

Useful link www.WorldVideoBusiness.com :- WorldVideoBusiness-WVB® is a business to business e-marketplace source of international trade leads, and tender opportunities from companies and government organizations around the globe.

About Us in Brief :-  (1) We specialize in DRT (Debt Recovery Tribunal) and NCLT (National Company Law Tribunal) matters. As a whole you may approach us for all DRT Problems and Solutions as well as matters connected with ARCIL i.e. Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Limited,  We have a Joint Venture with an America based law firm for various activities like BPO, legal BPO and DRT. The details of the said American firm and the joint venture may be seen at the page - Our US Joint Venture with Anand Ahuja Associates or in www.usindolegal.com (2) For your all problems including those in DRT, please phone us or send e-mail. Please give your contact details along with your problems in brief. As a whole you may approach us for all DRT Problems and Solutions.  (2) With our Legal Opinion, you need not worry about the Securitisation Act or other DRT matters or NCLT. Please visit the page Products & Services and Frequently Asked Questions (3) On account of our expertise in the Law of Torts and Banking and experience past 15 years, we can help you to submit suitable defence with winning strategy in DRT cases, Securitisation Act, Guarantors' defence etc.  (4) We need only copies of all available documents  to render our expert 'Legal Opinion' which will be quite useful and valuable to you particularly in DRT i.e. Debt recovery Tribunal. (5) We have also handled assignments for preparation of damage claims against Electricity Boards, Insurance Companies, Municipal Corporations etc. all on the basis of the Law of Torts.  (6) The DRT counterclaims is to be prepared well in advance so that it could be raised at proper time in DRT or other forum to safeguard the securities and assets. (7) Several DRT counterclaims drafted by us are being handled by different advocates at DRT Mumbai, DRT Delhi, DRT Jabalpur etc. Thus DRT advocates are available in these cities. Cases in other Debt Recovery Tribunals are under process. (8) This site is updated monthly mostly on every first Monday of the month or for urgent release on any day with latest material. (9) For further details about us, please visit the page About Us-DRT Solutions As a whole you may approach us for all DRT Problems and Solutions. We hail from the place to which Maharishi Mahesh Yogi and Acharya Rajnish belong and hence this site is dedicated to them.

Our this web site is dedicated to Yoga Rishi Baba Ramdev Ji Maharaj:- Our this web site is respectfully dedicated to Yoga Rishi Baba Ramdev Ji Maharaj whose method of Pranayam has cured even incurable diseases and thus has revolutionized modern medical science. For further details please visit our special page by clicking here Baba Ramdev Ji Maharaj, Yoga Guru, Cure for All Diseases, Medical Science Revolution

Site also dedicated to:-   (1) Swami Ramdevji, Acharya Balkishan and their Guru Pradumn Maharaj.

                                             (2) H.H. Maharishi Mahesh Yogi and Acharya Rajnish, the greatest gurus of all time www.maharishi.com, www.osho.com

                                           (3) Shri Hira Ratan Manek (HRM) for his pioneering work on Solar healing vide his web site www.solarhealing.com and forum at www.lifemysteries.com                                    

We regularly practice TM and SCI of Maharishi Mahesh Yogi. We also regularly practice Hath Yoga including Pranayam based on Baba Ramdev Ji  Maharaj. We daily watch his global TV program on Astha Channel from 05:30 AM to 8AM and 8PM to 9PM Indian Standards Time. On Sanskar channel, we daily view the discourse of Pradumn Maharaj from 4 AM to 5:30 AM. Many chronic diseases such as Cancer, Parkinsons' disease, Polio, Asthma, Hypertension, diabetes etc. have been cured by the said method of Pranayam which can be learnt even by watching his program on TV. Since 30th March '06, we have started practicing Sun Gazing as prescribed by HRM.

                                    (3) Shri Satyanarayan Morya alias 'Babaji' for his praiseworthy service to our nation. Please visit his site www.artistbaba.com 

Disclaimer:- We have no branch or setup other than at Indore. It is observed that some persons are using name of our firm as well as name of our web site. We have not given  any such authority to anyone to do so. Under such facts and circumstances, if anybody suffers any loss, we shall not be responsible. If such instance comes to notice of someone, we may kindly be informed.

Last Modified:- Please see the top of the Home Page

Copyright © 2001-2021 - DRT Legal Solutions, India. All rights reserved.